Japan’s Peacebuilding and Mid-Space Actors: A Bridge Between the West and the Rest

Abstract

This chapter focuses on Japan’s approach to peacebuilding, and examines its ability to emerge as a hybrid peacebuilding facilitator. To test this potential, three cases of Japan’s engagement with mid-space actors are studied. By reviewing Japan’s flagship projects in Timor-Leste, Myanmar and Mindanao, the chapter shows that Japan holds the ability to establish trust-relationships with top/national leaders of the aid-recipient countries through its apolitical, request-based, non-intrusive and long-term commitment approaches that Japanese actors display. At the same time, Japanese actors operating at the local/bottom are able to develop relationships with mid-space actors through providing them with important know-how and resources. This practice has allowed Japan to engage with conflict-affected societies where and when access of other donors was denied, which gave Japan an advantage in supporting local bridge-building initiatives. In short, this chapter demonstrated how Japan could bridge between Western donors and aid-recipient countries in Southeast Asia. While several shortcomings of the Japanese approach such as the limited inclusion of stakeholders and unequal distribution of peace dividend are identified in this chapter, it concluded that Japan could emerge as a hybrid peacebuilding facilitator if these shortcomings were addressed.

Emerging trends in peacebuilding: The case of Colombia

“…Johnston (2003), Limpach and Michaelowa (2010) note that the premise that development can facilitate lasting peace is shared by major international and Asian institutions such as the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the Asian Development Bank, among others. Official Development Assistance (ODA) has been a key to Japan's current peacebuilding efforts (Uesugi & Deekeling, 2020). Japan's ODA for peacebuilding maintains an apolitical nature by focusing on offering Japanese technical expertise, particularly in infrastructure and industrial development, which has allowed avoiding controversy with aid-recipient governments (Ichihara, 2017).…”