2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4215(02)00028-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Japan's nuclear energy policy: from firm commitment to difficult dilemma addressing growing stocks of plutonium, program delays, domestic opposition and international pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the report ''Long-term Plan for Research, Development, and Use of Nuclear Power'', 1 An article by Picket provides a useful reference for understanding Japanese nuclear energy policy (Pickett, 2002). 2 The energy demand scenario in 2010 is assumed in which the present energy policy framework is maintained.…”
Section: Development Of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Plutonium Utilization mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the report ''Long-term Plan for Research, Development, and Use of Nuclear Power'', 1 An article by Picket provides a useful reference for understanding Japanese nuclear energy policy (Pickett, 2002). 2 The energy demand scenario in 2010 is assumed in which the present energy policy framework is maintained.…”
Section: Development Of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Plutonium Utilization mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the accident of the Japanese FBR prototype reactor named ''Monju'' (Pickett, 2002), research and development (R&D) strategies have been examined by a separate ''Fast Breeder Reactor Council'' formed by the AECJ. The following is described in their main report: ''the Council considers the promotion of R&D of FBR to be valid for social and technical pursuit of future nuclear power and the possibility of realization of FBR as a promising choice of non-fossil energy source.''…”
Section: Fbrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economic incentives are provided to local communities that host an NPP to offset the anxiety about accident risks and to gain support for nuclear expansion policy from these communities (Pickett, 2002). There is much debate about the effectiveness and characteristics of this compensation scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientific Literature (Sung and Hong, 1999) (Choi et al, 2009) (Ahn and Han, 1998) (Park, 1992) (Valentine and Sovacool, 2010) (Lesbirel, 1990) (Pickett, 2002) (Park and Chevalier, 2010) (Berthelémy and Lévêque, 2011) (Leny Pellissier-Tanon, 1984) (Collingridge, D., 1984 a) (Golay, Saragossi and Willefert, 1977) (Grubler, 2010) (Roche, 2011) (Boulin and Boiteux, 2000) (David and Rothwell, 1994) (Plantè, 1998) Table 2 The sample: every company has been analyzed through websites, annual reports, news and archival records.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%