2023
DOI: 10.3390/admsci13060141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Japan’s Corporate Governance Transformation: Convergence or Reconfiguration?

Theo Renou,
René Carraz,
Thierry Burger-Helmchen

Abstract: Japanese firms have historically followed a country-specific model of corporate governance. Yet, Japan has had to adapt its corporate model over the last 30 years, along with the transformation of distinctive characteristics of Japanese capitalism in the same period. We review the historical evolution of Japanese corporate governance over the last three decades with a specific emphasis on the changes in the capital structure of major companies and the efforts to correct ineffective board of directors monitorin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 62 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Japanese model seeks to provide the best benefit to shareholders (who can also be creditors, suppliers, or customers), which encourages long-term decision-making and promotes the sustainability of the organisation [49]. A disadvantage of the model is that in some organisations, the funders are in senior management positions, which limits the decision-making power of shareholders [50], leading to a possible lack of transparency and a decrease in investor confidence.…”
Section: Corporate Governance Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Japanese model seeks to provide the best benefit to shareholders (who can also be creditors, suppliers, or customers), which encourages long-term decision-making and promotes the sustainability of the organisation [49]. A disadvantage of the model is that in some organisations, the funders are in senior management positions, which limits the decision-making power of shareholders [50], leading to a possible lack of transparency and a decrease in investor confidence.…”
Section: Corporate Governance Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%