2014
DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2014.914884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Janteloven and the Expression of Pride in Norway and the United States

Abstract: The current study tested how culture may affect the interpretation of the expression of pride among Norwegian and U.S. participants. Our results show that participants from Norway ascribed more negative trait attributions to a target person expressing pride than U.S. participants. It is proposed that Janteloven is responsible for the differences in these trait attributions, and we interpret the results from a "closed-system" and "open-system" (Mayr, 1976) perspective.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many contexts, pride is thought of as undesirable (e.g. Bromgard et al, 2014;Eid & Diener, 2009;Stipek, 1998). People who express pride of achievements are evaluated less positively than less expressive achievers (Kalokerinos, Greenaway, Pedder, & Margetts, 2014), especially if the achievement domain is important for or desired by the observer (Lockwood & Kunda, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In many contexts, pride is thought of as undesirable (e.g. Bromgard et al, 2014;Eid & Diener, 2009;Stipek, 1998). People who express pride of achievements are evaluated less positively than less expressive achievers (Kalokerinos, Greenaway, Pedder, & Margetts, 2014), especially if the achievement domain is important for or desired by the observer (Lockwood & Kunda, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it has been argued that proud individuals distance themselves from others (disengage), explaining why this emotion may be evaluated less positively in cultures where social relations are more tight (e.g. Kitayama et al, 2006), or where norms for acting humbly are present (Bromgard, Trafimow, & Linn, 2014). As another example, proud people (in comparison to compassionate people) tend to perceive themselves as more similar to strong than weak (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could relate to cultural differences in terms of individualism vs collectivism but also in terms of egalitarianism. For example, Nordic countries, that have a strong egalitarian nature, embrace the so-called Law of Jante (Brombard et al, 2014;Cappelen and Dahlberg, 2018) that includes rules like "you're not to think you are anything special" and "you're not to think you are more important than we are" which would clearly conflict with any entitlement tendencies.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TPS is presumed to have emerged from New Zealand’s geographic isolation (Packer, 2014) and a mix of the social characteristics of its indigenous Māori population (Haar and Delaney, 2009) and early British immigrants (Packer, 2014), resulting in a largely egalitarian culture (Hugo, 2006; Peeters, 2004; Trevor-Roberts et al, 2003). TPS is often considered to be culturally specific to Australasia, but it is also noted elsewhere, such as the Nordic countries where the ‘Law of Jante’ (janteloven) discourages people to promote their achievements (Scott, 2013) or show pride (Bromgard et al, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%