2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Janitor ergonomics and injuries in the safe workload ergonomic exposure project (SWEEP) study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Back injuries are common in jobs involving prolonged standing and long hours (Kamani and Kalwar2021). Likewise, it is monotonous manual jobs that have a high rate of injury potential (Schwartz et al 2019). As long as there is a high-frequency task that demands a lot of effort in an inadequate posture, the probability of occurrence of this disorder will be higher (Caroly et al 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Back injuries are common in jobs involving prolonged standing and long hours (Kamani and Kalwar2021). Likewise, it is monotonous manual jobs that have a high rate of injury potential (Schwartz et al 2019). As long as there is a high-frequency task that demands a lot of effort in an inadequate posture, the probability of occurrence of this disorder will be higher (Caroly et al 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, as of May 2020, there were nearly two million people employed as janitors and cleaners in the US, and the growing speed of the industry was estimated to be as fast as the average for all occupations (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2021). Given its labor-intensive nature, cleaning job exposes workers to significant occupational hazards, including both physical and mental work-related injuries (Schwartz et al, 2019). While typical cleaning tasks may have relatively low force requirements, they are usually repetitive, demand awkward postures, and have a strict time limit, making the job have one of the highest workplace incident rates (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hignett and McAtamney [ 16 ] evaluated the precision of REBA and found that 62–85% of expert users scored similarly for all the selected postures, except for the upper arm [ 20 ]. Schwartz et al [ 23 ] studied eight janitorial tasks and found that the average REBA scores for all tasks were in high-risk categories. Eight observers used the REBA method to evaluate their tasks and verified the reliability of REBA in practice (ICC = 0.925).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight observers used the REBA method to evaluate their tasks and verified the reliability of REBA in practice (ICC = 0.925). The observers were highly confident in using the REBA method after standardized training [ 23 ]. Thus, the REBA method has high accuracy, can thoroughly evaluate the risk of factory workers’ working posture, and can perform automatic evaluation through algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%