IEEE Military Communications Conference, 2003. MILCOM 2003.
DOI: 10.1109/milcom.2003.1290325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jammed FH-FSK performance in Rayleigh and Nakagami-m fading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When m > 1, it gives the fading that is less severe than Rayleigh. Furthermore, when m = ∞, it simplifies to AWGN [9]. The fading figures and variances of h 0 , h 1 , h 2 , h 3 , and h 4 are respectively denoted as {m 0 , β 0 }, {m 1 , β 1 }, {m 2 , β 2 }, {m 3 , β 3 }, and {m 4 , β 4 }.…”
Section: B Channel Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When m > 1, it gives the fading that is less severe than Rayleigh. Furthermore, when m = ∞, it simplifies to AWGN [9]. The fading figures and variances of h 0 , h 1 , h 2 , h 3 , and h 4 are respectively denoted as {m 0 , β 0 }, {m 1 , β 1 }, {m 2 , β 2 }, {m 3 , β 3 }, and {m 4 , β 4 }.…”
Section: B Channel Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequency hopping spread spectrum is extensively analyzed in terms of the bit error rate for different channel models and jamming scenarios using different receiver structures. In [34] the performance of FH/BFSK is analyzed in terms of bit error rate (BER) in the presence of wideband and partial band jamming (PBJ) in Rayleigh and Nakagami channel fading models. The performance of non-coherent FFH/BFSK in the presence of PBJ and in the absence of fading is examined in [35].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%