James McNaughton, <i>Samuel Beckett and the Politics of Aftermath</i> Derval Tubridy, <i>Samuel Beckett and the Language of Subjectivity</i>

Little, James

doi:10.3366/iur.2020.0455

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…More than other forms, morphology, quotation forms, lexical choices, indicatives, and the narrator's point-of-view analysis in narrative analysis contribute to the identification of perspective. Regardless of the form of language, it is a product of the discourse writer's expression of self, cognitive activities such as his/her knowledge, attitudes, and emotions about the event to the discourse reader and, in this way, guide the reader to literate the event in a particular way, reflecting subjectivity and interactional subjectivity [7][8]. Subjectivity refers to the way in which natural language structures and their conventional expressions provide speech subjects with ways to express themselves and their attitudes and beliefs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the Subjectivity of English Academic Discourse in the Context of Big Data

Pan

2024

Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study develops a sentiment analysis model for English academic discourse based on word information to effectively understand and analyze the sentiment tendencies in English literary texts. The structure of the model includes word embedding layer, character-level feature extraction, word-level feature extraction and feature fusion and classification layer. The word embedding layer realizes the mapping between word vectors and word vectors by microblogging pre-trained word vectors. The character-level feature extraction session uses a multi-window convolutional layer to capture N-Gram information. In contrast, the word-level feature extraction obtains deeper semantic information through a Bi-LSTM layer and fuses it with character-level information to enhance robustness. The feature fusion and classification layer further combines these features and determines the fusion weights through a linear layer to achieve sentiment classification. In performance tests, the model achieves 92.5% sentiment classification accuracy on the standard dataset, an improvement of about 6% compared to traditional methods. In particular, the accuracy is improved by 5% when dealing with text with sentiment polarity transition, showing good adaptability. In addition, using 657 positive and 679 negative sentiment words as seed words effectively expands the sentiment lexicon and enhances the comprehensiveness and accuracy of sentiment analysis.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the Subjectivity of English Academic Discourse in the Context of Big Data

Pan

2024

Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

James McNaughton, Samuel Beckett and the Politics of Aftermath Derval Tubridy, Samuel Beckett and the Language of Subjectivity

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Exploring the Subjectivity of English Academic Discourse in the Context of Big Data

Exploring the Subjectivity of English Academic Discourse in the Context of Big Data

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About