2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1703-0_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

James A. Graaskamp, Richard T. Ely, and the Tradition of Real Estate and Urban Land Economics at the University of Wisconsin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This leadership role both reflects and reinforces Wisconsin's interdisciplinary view of real estate being strongly linked to public policy concerns, as noted by Jaffe (1992) and Weiss (1992).…”
Section: Institutional Dominancesupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This leadership role both reflects and reinforces Wisconsin's interdisciplinary view of real estate being strongly linked to public policy concerns, as noted by Jaffe (1992) and Weiss (1992).…”
Section: Institutional Dominancesupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Clapp and Myers (2000) outline the extent to which urban property research has undergone a Kuhnian paradigm shift. The rich tradition of applied "real estate and urban land economics" that can traced from James A. Graaskamp, through Richard Ratcliff, Homer Hoyt and Ernest Fisher back to Richard T. Ely was overthrown by the urban economics paradigm (or the new urban economics (NUE)) in the 1960s and 1970s (Weiss, 2000). This change heralded the substitution of inductive methods, based on the direct observation of facts, by deductive modes of thought that deploy a set of assumptions in order to deduce logical conclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%