2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

JAK-STAT signaling is activated in the kidney and peripheral blood cells of patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

Abstract: Focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS) is a devastating disease with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Activated JAK-STAT signaling has been implicated in other kidney diseases. Since new technologies allow us to better evaluate changes in systemic and renal JAK-STAT activity as it relates to kidney function, we examined this in 106 patients with biopsy-proven FSGS compared to 47 healthy control individuals. Peripheral immune function was assessed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by phosp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5A). These gene sets were used to generate "aggregate gene expression scores" in isolated glomerular tissue from a cohort of individuals with various etiologies of chronic kidney disease (European Renal cDNA Bank, ERCB) (28,29). Query of the subset of the identified genes available on the microarray platforms ( Fig.…”
Section: Genes Highly Expressed In Immature Glomerular Epithelial Celmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5A). These gene sets were used to generate "aggregate gene expression scores" in isolated glomerular tissue from a cohort of individuals with various etiologies of chronic kidney disease (European Renal cDNA Bank, ERCB) (28,29). Query of the subset of the identified genes available on the microarray platforms ( Fig.…”
Section: Genes Highly Expressed In Immature Glomerular Epithelial Celmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because expression of a single gene is not necessarily indicative of network or pathway activity, a STAT1 score was generated, given that a similar approach yielded a JAK-STAT activation score that was associated with increased STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation in FSGS 13 . Using a data driven approach, a kidney-specific STAT1 network comprised of 17 genes was identified 14 , and further refined for genes functionally up-regulated by IFNγ stimulation by utilizing the Database of IFN Regulated Genes, Interferome 15 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the inflammatory-related pathways, evidence for their potential causal role in autoimmune or renal disease has been established, including TNF [28][29][30] , JAK-STAT 16 , NFκB 31 , proteasome signaling 32,33 , and reactivation of glucocorticoid signaling through the use of glucocorticoid agonists 34 . JAK-STAT pathway activation has already been implicated across other kidney diseases including diabetic kidney disease (DKD) [35][36][37][38] , and FSGS 13 . In addition to the inflammatory-related pathways, reduced HNF4 transcriptional activity could represent a state of de-differentiation as Hnf4a can induce mesenchymal to epithelial transition 39 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In upstream regulator analysis (an analysis that takes into account both enrichment of and underlying direction of differential gene expression changes using cause and effect relationships), the top predicted activated protein network was TNF (IPA Z-score=10.2, enrichment p-value=3.65E-84, Figure 3B). A mechanistic network centered on downstream effects of TNF activation explained 26% (660/2517) of the differentially expressed genes in the analysis and included multiple transcription factors previously implicated in chronic kidney diseases including activation of the NFκB complex (as well as activation of NFKB1 (p105/p50) and RELA (p65) subunits) (8-10), and STAT1 and STAT3 (11). Lastly, 11 of the genes in the TNF causal network (including TNF) were supported by multiple literature assertions in IPA ( Figure 3C), and were also profiled on a targeted proteomic profile panel.…”
Section: Functional Context Of Differentially Expressed Genes and Repmentioning
confidence: 99%