Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2330784.2330814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

JADE, an adaptive differential evolution algorithm, benchmarked on the BBOB noiseless testbed

Abstract: JADE, an adaptive version of the differential evolution (DE) algorithm, is benchmarked on the testbed of 24 noiseless functions chosen for the Black-Box Optimization Benchmarking workshop. The results of full-featured JADE are then compared with the results of 3 other DE variants ("downgraded" JADE variants) to reveal the contributions of the algorithm components. Another adaptive DE variant benchmarked during BBOB 2010 is used as a reference algorithm. The results confirm that the original JADE outperforms th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For algorithms which are invariant per rotation (not DE, not PSO) this does not make any difference. (c) Adaptive methods for choosing parameters might be tested for PSO or DE [42,28,31,7] as they could maybe handle better the extreme size of our problems. (d) We tested the addition of completely useless variables.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For algorithms which are invariant per rotation (not DE, not PSO) this does not make any difference. (c) Adaptive methods for choosing parameters might be tested for PSO or DE [42,28,31,7] as they could maybe handle better the extreme size of our problems. (d) We tested the addition of completely useless variables.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their performance is compared to the new DE/rand/rand/1/acm strategy ('acm') and a variant of JADE algorithm without archive ('JADE') [12] with asynchronous DE/rand/rand/1/bin strategy. The latter algorithm uses an adaptive scheme for crossover rate and was shown to have better performance compared to other adaptive DE algorithms [12,5]. For all four strategies Fmin = 0.1, Fmax = 1.0, cF = 0.01, σF = 0.1, initial µF = 0.5 and N min p = 10 are used.…”
Section: Numerical Tests and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar population size was also applied in [10]. The crossover strategy is the exponential one and the mutation operator combines the best member with other two randomly chosen individuals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%