2018
DOI: 10.1590/1518-8345.2249.3003
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jacobson and Truax Method: evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of a home care program after prostatectomy

Abstract: Objective:to exemplify the applicability of the Jacobson and Truax Method in a nursing intervention study that analyzed the effectiveness of a home care teaching program after radical prostatectomy. Method:this is a descriptive study concerning the applicability of the Jacobson and Truax Method in the data analysis of a clinical trial. The intervention consisted of a teaching program for hospital discharge after radical prostatectomy through oral guidance, writing, and telephonic reinforcement. Thirty-four men… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a complement to the analysis of statistical significance of differences over time and considering that the main aim of a pilot trial is to assess feasibility, the analysis of reliable and clinically significant change, according to Jacobson and Truax's method, was conducted in the sample of EG and ACG participants that completed the respective four sessions. This method proposes a comparative analysis between pre and post‐intervention scores in order to analyse whether the differences between participants represent reliable changes and are clinically relevant 51–54 . To calculate the reliable change index, standard deviation at baseline from the sample that completed the four sessions of EG/ACG was used, as well as the McDonald Omega of measures in the total sample ( N = 54), were used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a complement to the analysis of statistical significance of differences over time and considering that the main aim of a pilot trial is to assess feasibility, the analysis of reliable and clinically significant change, according to Jacobson and Truax's method, was conducted in the sample of EG and ACG participants that completed the respective four sessions. This method proposes a comparative analysis between pre and post‐intervention scores in order to analyse whether the differences between participants represent reliable changes and are clinically relevant 51–54 . To calculate the reliable change index, standard deviation at baseline from the sample that completed the four sessions of EG/ACG was used, as well as the McDonald Omega of measures in the total sample ( N = 54), were used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method proposes a comparative analysis between pre and post-intervention scores in order to analyse whether the differences between participants represent reliable changes and are clinically relevant. [51][52][53][54] To calculate the reliable change index, standard deviation at baseline from the sample that completed the four sessions of EG/ACG was used, as well as the McDonald Omega of measures in the total sample (N = 54), were used. Following Jacobson and Truax's method, in order to assess whether the changes were clinically meaningful, criterion A was adopted, which is used when normative data for the functional (non-clinical) population are not available.…”
Section: Analytical Methods (For Primary and Secondary Outcomes)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive and negative values in this score indicate an increase and decrease. Therefore, a value that moves between +1.96 and -1.96 is interpreted as no significant change or no change (Mata et al, 2018;Morley, 2018).…”
Section: Data Analysis Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%