2009
DOI: 10.5802/aif.2430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jacobians in isogeny classes of abelian surfaces over finite fields

Abstract: We give a complete answer to the question of which polynomials occur as the characteristic polynomials of Frobenius for genus-2 curves over finite fields.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If q = 3, then by [6], E × E is isogenous to a Jacobian, so suppose that q ≥ 5. The elliptic curve E has 2 rational branch points, so applying to P 1 some suitable rational automorphism, we can assume that z 1 = 0 and z 2 = 1.…”
Section: Prym Varieties Of Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If q = 3, then by [6], E × E is isogenous to a Jacobian, so suppose that q ≥ 5. The elliptic curve E has 2 rational branch points, so applying to P 1 some suitable rational automorphism, we can assume that z 1 = 0 and z 2 = 1.…”
Section: Prym Varieties Of Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the third step, we use Proposition 13 combined with results from [6] (which gives a description of the set of isogeny classes of abelian surfaces containing a Jacobian), Proposition 14 and Lemma 15.…”
Section: Prym Varieties Of Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Condition ( (1,4), (2,5), or (3,6) Proof. Let J be an abelian surface over F q whose Weil polynomial P J = X 4 + aX 3 + bX 2 + aqX + q 2 satisfies one of (1.1)-(1.5).…”
Section: Moreover the Surface J Is Simple If And Only If Eithermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 (9, 42) 9 (6, 20) 7 (4,16) 5 (3,6) or (8,26) 4 (2,5), (4, 11), or (6, 17) 3 (1,4), (3,5), or (4, 10) 2 (0, 3), (1,0), (1,4), (2,5), or (3,6) The special form required of the Frobenius endomorphism in [4] has an immediate consequence for the shape of its characteristic polynomial, and by inspection the above polynomials do not have the required shape. Thus the main result of [4] follows from the above result.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is possible to write down all isogeny classes of supersingular abelian surfaces by adding to the simple classes given in Table 1 the split isogeny classes. By [HNR06] we know exactly what isogeny classes of abelian surfaces do not contain Jacobians and they can be dropped from the list. By the results of Xing and Zhu we can distribute the remaining isogeny classes according to the possible values of rk 2 .…”
Section: Zeta Function and Cryptographic Exponentmentioning
confidence: 99%