2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11075-017-0396-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jacobi method for symmetric 4 × 4 matrices converges for every cyclic pivot strategy

Abstract: Abstract. The paper studies the global convergence of the Jacobi method for symmetric matrices of size 4. We prove global convergence for all 720 cyclic pivot strategies. Precisely, we show that inequality S(), t ≥ 1, holds with the constant γ < 1 that depends neither on the matrix A nor on the pivot strategy. Here A [t] stands for the matrix obtained from A after t full cycles of the Jacobi method and S(A) is the off-diagonal norm of A. We show why three consecutive cycles have to be considered. The result h… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since it immediately follows from (1.1) that θ (0) = φ (1) , θ (1) = φ (0) . Thus, after completing the first two steps in each of the two processes, we have A (2) = P T R T 23 (θ (1) )R T 14 (θ (0) )AR 14 (θ (0) )R 23 (θ (1) )P = P T A (2) P. This shows that the relation (A.1) holds if A (0) and A (0) are replaced by A (2) and A (2) = P T A (2) P , respectively. Checking the angle formula (1.1) we find that θ (2) (2) and therefore A (4) = P T A (4) P .…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Since it immediately follows from (1.1) that θ (0) = φ (1) , θ (1) = φ (0) . Thus, after completing the first two steps in each of the two processes, we have A (2) = P T R T 23 (θ (1) )R T 14 (θ (0) )AR 14 (θ (0) )R 23 (θ (1) )P = P T A (2) P. This shows that the relation (A.1) holds if A (0) and A (0) are replaced by A (2) and A (2) = P T A (2) P , respectively. Checking the angle formula (1.1) we find that θ (2) (2) and therefore A (4) = P T A (4) P .…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Thus, after completing the first two steps in each of the two processes, we have A (2) = P T R T 23 (θ (1) )R T 14 (θ (0) )AR 14 (θ (0) )R 23 (θ (1) )P = P T A (2) P. This shows that the relation (A.1) holds if A (0) and A (0) are replaced by A (2) and A (2) = P T A (2) P , respectively. Checking the angle formula (1.1) we find that θ (2) (2) and therefore A (4) = P T A (4) P . The last check is the easiest one since the denominators in (1.1) for the angles θ (4) and θ (5) are opposite to those for the angles φ (4) and φ (5) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations