2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

J2-deformation-type soil model coupled with state-dependent dilatancy and fabric evolution: multiaxial formulation and FEM implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Updating the stress values in the UMAT subroutine necessitates using different algorithms for the elastic and plastic stages. When the stress lies within the elastic range, the relationship between the stress and strain increments can be expressed as whereas when the stress is beyond the elastic range where [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Updating the stress values in the UMAT subroutine necessitates using different algorithms for the elastic and plastic stages. When the stress lies within the elastic range, the relationship between the stress and strain increments can be expressed as whereas when the stress is beyond the elastic range where [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the high nonlinear degree of the elastoplastic process, the Euler integration method has only second-order accuracy [ 32 ], which may result in large error accumulation for the elastoplastic process with a high degree of nonlinearity. Accordingly, we used the substepping method for the constitutive integration of the elastoplastic process, that is, the total elastoplastic strain increment was divided into several sub-increments.…”
Section: Establishing the Constitutive Model Of Pekk Powdersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we applied the stress-explicit integration method. This method can automatically control the error [ 32 , 33 ] and size of the sub-increment step according to the nonlinear degree of the elastoplastic process, taking into account the calculation accuracy and efficiency. The specific analysis is shown in Figure 4 .…”
Section: Establishing the Constitutive Model Of Pekk Powdersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical behavior of soil is known to be significantly affected by its state characterized by its density, stress level, and fabric anisotropy 3,4,40–43 . Although the basic hypoplastic model described in Section 2 can reasonably simulate the soil behavior under the combined effect of density and stress level, it does not consider the anisotropic properties of sand.…”
Section: Non‐coaxial Hypoplastic Model For Anisotropic Sandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial fabric norm ( F 0 ) represents the degree of anisotropy and can be quantified based on advanced microscale testing methods, such as scanning electron microscopy, computed tomography (CT), and micro‐CT. F 0 = 0.4 ∼ 0.5 is generally chosen for sand prepared through the dry‐deposited method, and has been often adopted by some constitutive models 25,26,28–30,38,39,43,51 . The parameter m specifies the evolution rate of the fabric, and the other three parameters e A , λ , and k reflect the effect of fabric anisotropy on the dilatancy, strength, and degree of non‐coaxiality, respectively.…”
Section: Simulation Of Elemental Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%