2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10704-011-9595-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

J-integral and CMOD for external inclined cracks on autofrettaged cylinders

Abstract: Autofrettage is a well-known method to increase the load carrying capacity of the pressure vessels. The autofrettage outcomes can be contrary when the imperfections or material discontinuities are on the outer surface. In this study, the influences of the external inclined cracks on the fracture parameters in autofrettaged cylinders were studied. The inclination angles of cracks are different but they have the same depth. Crack mouth opening displacements and J-Integral values along the cracks front were inves… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, has a linear relationship with in this load range; thus, 22 is expected to be constant and independent of . Considering the fact that fracture was always observed to occur after 22 reached 22 for A533B steel [20] and for S55C steel in this work and in [14], the minimum that can satisfy 22 = 22 seems to correspond to the minimum observed with the specimen configuration and the material at a specific temperature. This finding is consistent with the opinion of Chen et al that "the minimum fracture toughness is a definite parameter determined by the specimen geometry and yielding properties" [26] and will be examined in more detail in the future.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Usually, has a linear relationship with in this load range; thus, 22 is expected to be constant and independent of . Considering the fact that fracture was always observed to occur after 22 reached 22 for A533B steel [20] and for S55C steel in this work and in [14], the minimum that can satisfy 22 = 22 seems to correspond to the minimum observed with the specimen configuration and the material at a specific temperature. This finding is consistent with the opinion of Chen et al that "the minimum fracture toughness is a definite parameter determined by the specimen geometry and yielding properties" [26] and will be examined in more detail in the future.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The difference in , especially the bounding nature for large TST, clearly correlated with the difference in 33 at the fracture load. The idea to explain the TST effect by using the difference in 33 was supported by many researchers, such as [19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%