1995
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/28/6/011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

J dependences of the isotope shifts in Ti I 3d24s2a3P and 3d34p y3Doterms

Abstract: Atomic beam laser spectroscopy was used to measure the isotope shifts (IS) and hyperfine structures of all stable titanium isotopes in eight Ti I spectral lines. Six of the lines investigated cover all allowed transitions between the lower 3d24s2 a 3P and the upper 3d34p y 3Do terms; two of them are between the 3d24s2 a 3P1,2 and 3d24s4p z 3P2o levels. J-dependences of the IS in the a 3P and y 3Do terms were established. The contributions of the field and mass shifts to the J-dependence were separated using mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
13
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(6 reference statements)
4
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In cases of overlap, the ABMR data of Aydin et al have smaller uncertainties than those of Johann et al (1981), whereas the LFS data of Gangrsky et al is preferable to Aydin et al's LFS. LFS data from Jin et al (2009) is of similar quality to, and agrees well with, that of Gangrsky et al (1995). The only HFS data on Ti  are the experimental ABMR and corresponding theoretical values produced by Berrah-Mansour et al (1992), and the LFS data of Nouri et al (2010).…”
Section: Isotopic and Hyperfine Structuresupporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In cases of overlap, the ABMR data of Aydin et al have smaller uncertainties than those of Johann et al (1981), whereas the LFS data of Gangrsky et al is preferable to Aydin et al's LFS. LFS data from Jin et al (2009) is of similar quality to, and agrees well with, that of Gangrsky et al (1995). The only HFS data on Ti  are the experimental ABMR and corresponding theoretical values produced by Berrah-Mansour et al (1992), and the LFS data of Nouri et al (2010).…”
Section: Isotopic and Hyperfine Structuresupporting
confidence: 66%
“…We therefore use the experimental values for the relevant isotope where available, but use rescaled experimental data from the other where it does not exist for both isotopes. Data on hyperfine structure for the Ti  lines for which we have isotopic information are best obtained from Gangrsky et al (1995) and Aydin et al (1990). In cases of overlap, the ABMR data of Aydin et al have smaller uncertainties than those of Johann et al (1981), whereas the LFS data of Gangrsky et al is preferable to Aydin et al's LFS.…”
Section: Isotopic and Hyperfine Structurementioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it is only recently that some results have been published [3][4][5][6][7]. Two of the articles mentioned, by Anastassov et al [5] and Gangrsky et al [7], contain new results for the changes of nuclear mean square charge radii, extracted from the optical data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%