2015
DOI: 10.17216/limnofish-5000086696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

İznik Gölü (Bursa/Türkiye)’ndeki Gümüşi Havuz Balığının (Carassius gibelio Bloch, 1782) Büyüme Özellikleri

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research on other lakes and reservoirs showed that the maximum age of C. gibelio was VI for Lake Marmara (Balık et al 1991), Lake Eğirdir (Balık et al 2004), the Buldan Reservoir in Denizli (Sarı et al 2008), the Topcam Reservoir in Aydın (Şaşı 2015), Lake İznik in Bursa (Uysal et al 2015) and Lake Marmara (the present study). The maximum age for C. gibelio was VII in Lake Bafra in Samsun, Lake Uluabat in Bursa and the Seyitler Reservoir in Afyonkarahisar (Table 5).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous research on other lakes and reservoirs showed that the maximum age of C. gibelio was VI for Lake Marmara (Balık et al 1991), Lake Eğirdir (Balık et al 2004), the Buldan Reservoir in Denizli (Sarı et al 2008), the Topcam Reservoir in Aydın (Şaşı 2015), Lake İznik in Bursa (Uysal et al 2015) and Lake Marmara (the present study). The maximum age for C. gibelio was VII in Lake Bafra in Samsun, Lake Uluabat in Bursa and the Seyitler Reservoir in Afyonkarahisar (Table 5).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The maximum asymptotic length was 48.09 cm (fork length) in the Seyitler Reservoir (Bulut et al 2013) and the minimum asymptotic length was 31.60 cm in the Buldan Reservoir (Sarı et al 2008). Values from some other studies were: L ∞ = 41.46 cm (fork length) in the Topçam Reservoir (Şaşı 2015); L ∞ = 40.00 cm (fork length) in Lake İznik (Uysal et al 2015); L ∞ = 38.90 cm in Lake Eğirdir (Özkök et al 2007); L ∞ = 33.30 cm in Lake Eğirdir (Balık et al 2004); L ∞ = 39.38 cm in the Danube River (Gheorghe et al 2012), with the maximum total length and asymptotic length determined as L max = 27.5 cm and L ∞ = 35.86 cm, respectively. These morphological parameters are smaller compared to the Danube River: L max = 35.0 cm, L ∞ = 39.38 (Gheorghe et al 2012), Lake Uluabat: L max = 33.3 cm, L ∞ = 36.44 (Emiroğlu 2008) and the Seyitler Reservoir: L max = 32.5 cm, L ∞ = 48.09 (Bulut et al 2013).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 89%
“…There are adverse relationship between increasing mesh size and retention of male individuals. Female specimens were caught three times more than male specimens same results were reported by Uysal et al, (2014); Emiroğlu (2008); Sarı et al, (2008). This was due to the female specimens ratio was higher than male specimens in advances age groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%