2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-017-1213-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iwahashi Zenbei’s Sunspot Drawings in 1793 in Japan

Abstract: Three Japanese sunspot drawings associated with Iwahashi Zenbei (1756-1811) are shown here from contemporary manuscripts and woodprint documents with the relevant texts. We revealed the observational date of one of the drawings to be 26 August 1793, and the overall observations lasted for over a year. Moreover, we identified the observational site for the dated drawing at Fushimi in Japan. We then compared his observations with group sunspot number and raw group count from Sunspot Index and Long-term Solar Obs… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the incorporation to the database of group counts of new information about sunspot records not previously published is important to improve the temporary coverage of this period. Thus, the recovery of a sunspot drawing made by Iwahashi Zenbei (Hayakawa et al, 2018) on 26 August 1793 and an undated one, during the decline phase of the Solar Cycle 4, and a set of 25 drawings by Jonathan Fisher (Denig and McVaugh, 2017) We found sunspot observations performed by Cassian Hallaschka in 1814 and 1816 (shortly before the maximum of the Solar Cycle 6) which have not yet been included in sunspot studies. The aim of this work is to present these solar observations and to contribute to improve the reconstruction of solar activity of the past, in particular, of the Dalton minimum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, the incorporation to the database of group counts of new information about sunspot records not previously published is important to improve the temporary coverage of this period. Thus, the recovery of a sunspot drawing made by Iwahashi Zenbei (Hayakawa et al, 2018) on 26 August 1793 and an undated one, during the decline phase of the Solar Cycle 4, and a set of 25 drawings by Jonathan Fisher (Denig and McVaugh, 2017) We found sunspot observations performed by Cassian Hallaschka in 1814 and 1816 (shortly before the maximum of the Solar Cycle 6) which have not yet been included in sunspot studies. The aim of this work is to present these solar observations and to contribute to improve the reconstruction of solar activity of the past, in particular, of the Dalton minimum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The most intense geomagnetic storm in history of ground-based telescopic observations is believed to be so-called the "Carrington event" in 1859 (Carrington 1859;Kimball 1960;Tsurutani et al 2003;Cliver & Svalgaard 2004;Hayakawa et al 2016b), with an estimated disturbance storm time (Dst) index of ~ −1760 nT (Tsurutani et al 2003). In this event, a white light flare within a great sunspot on 1859.09.01 observed by Carrington (1859;1863) caused a series of severe magnetic storms and low-latitude auroras up to 23° in magnetic latitude such as Hawaii, Caribbean Islands, or Southern Japan were observed (Kimball 1960;Cliver & Svalgaard 2004;Hayakawa et al 2016b). Recent studies warn us that the same-scaled solar storms can cause severe disasters as serious as 2 trillion USD in case they hit the modern civilization (National Research Council 2008), so that extreme events like Carrington event require intensive studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… We review some applications of the method of electronic searching for historical observations of sunspots and aurorae in the Chinese text corpus by Hayakawa et al (, , , ), Kawamura et al (), and Tamazawa et al (). However, we show strong shortcomings in the digital search technique as applied by them: almost all likely true sunspot and aurora records were presented earlier (e.g., Xu et al ), which are not mentioned in those papers; the remaining records are dubious and often refer to other phenomena, neither spots nor aurorae (this also applies to Hayakawa et al ). The alleged aurorae in Hayakawa et al () and Kawamura et al () show a broad peak around full moon, not expected for aurorae.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%