Ivory arthroplasty for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: 10-year follow-up

Abstract

II.

Trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: 199 patients with a minimum of 10 years follow-up

“…Long-term reviews of De la Caffiniere prostheses (Chakrabarti et al., 1997; Johnston et al., 2012; Sondergaard et al., 1991) showed survival rates ranging from 76% to 82% and loosening up to 40%. The long-term studies of current ball-and-socket prostheses (Apard and Saint Cast, 2009; Cootjans et al., 2017; Martin-Ferrero, 2014; Toffoli and Teissier, 2017; Vissers et al., 2019) report better survival (89%–96%) and lower loosening rates (4%–7%) in these prostheses, but may experience dislocation at a frequency of approximately 5%. These data were expected because De la Caffiniere implants, despite being a ball-and-socket design, have the important drawbacks of being constrained and cemented, while current prostheses are modular, uncemented, and unconstrained.…”

“…Over the past decades, different implants for the CMC joint have been developed, among which the most often used is the ball-and-socket-type implant (Apard and Saint Cast, 2009; Badía and Sambandam, 2006; Brutus and Kinnen, 2004; Chakrabarti et al., 1997; Comtet, 2000; Cootjans et al., 2017; De la Caffiniere and Aucouturier, 1979; Johnston et al., 2012; Martin-Ferrero, 2014; Sondergaard et al., 1991; Toffoli and Teissier, 2017; Vissers et al., 2019). The long-term outcomes are a common concern of surgeons.…”

Results of 110 IVORY® prostheses for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis with a minimum follow-up of 10 years

“…Total TMC joint replacement, which is now part of the therapeutic arsenal, is being more widely used. It allows a faster return to traditional habits (activity) and, in the long-term perspective, provides good results as far as pain relief, the recovery of mobility and strength are concerned (Gaisne et al., 2009; Vissers et al., 2019). However, joint replacement may lead to complications, such as dislocation and loosening (Kollig et al., 2017; Ledoux, 1997).…”

Elektra prosthesis versus resection-suspension arthroplasty for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: a long-term cohort study

“…The main drawback of replacement arthroplasty is aseptic cup loosening, cited as the most common reason for implant failure, leading to revision rates of 42%–51% (Hansen and Homilius, 2010; Hernández-Cortés et al., 2012; Kaszap et al., 2012; Klahn et al., 2012; Kollig et al., 2017). However, a number of good to excellent outcomes have also been published (Badia and Sambandam, 2006; Cootjans et al., 2017; Dehl et al., 2017; Krukhaug et al., 2014; Regnard, 2006; Vissers et al., 2019).…”