2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

iTReX: Interactive exploration of mono- and combination therapy dose response profiling data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drug sensitivity of the FTC samples was tested for at least 76 clinically relevant drugs (mostly approved or late-phase clinical trials). The drug response was evaluated via the drug sensitivity score (DSS) as proposed by Yadav et al for high-throughput compound testing studies [28] with minor modifications (DSS asym ) [25]. We first confirmed that the different culture models reflected the molecular profile of the original tumor via DNA methylation analysis.…”
Section: Characterization and Comparison Of The Three Patient-derived...mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Drug sensitivity of the FTC samples was tested for at least 76 clinically relevant drugs (mostly approved or late-phase clinical trials). The drug response was evaluated via the drug sensitivity score (DSS) as proposed by Yadav et al for high-throughput compound testing studies [28] with minor modifications (DSS asym ) [25]. We first confirmed that the different culture models reflected the molecular profile of the original tumor via DNA methylation analysis.…”
Section: Characterization and Comparison Of The Three Patient-derived...mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Bioluminescence was read on a TECAN Spark (TECAN, Männedorf, Switzerland) or PheraStar (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany) plate reader. Results were analyzed for dose-response curves and drug sensitivity with the iTReX Shiny app [25] (LTCs and PDX-Cs; DSS asym computed with A min set to 10% from I max ) or an in-house developed automated drug screen analysis pipeline (FTCs).…”
Section: Drug Screening and Metabolic Activity Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drug library consisted of 76 drugs of which most were approved and some were investigative compounds and the plate production was performed as previously published. 35 All concentrations were tested in duplicates, readout (after 72 hrs) was done on a PHERAstar FS microplate reader (BMG Labtech) using CellTiterGlo 2.0 (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Drug sensitivity analyses were performed using the web-based drug analysis pipeline BREEZE ( https://breeze.fimm.fi ), developed at the Institute for Molecular Medicine Finnland (FIMM).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CNNs fine-tuned using screen-specific controls (phases II and III, respectively) were subsequently applied to images acquired from all wells of that screen. Drug-sensitivity scoring used a prerelease version of the iTReX web application for drug-sensitivity scoring ( [40], v1.1.1.9000, functionally identical to release v1.2.0), run in R v4.1. Due to label smoothing (α = 0.4), raw image-based cell viabilities generally range around the interval [0.2, 0.8] and were therefore normalized using positive (STS, set to 0%) and negative (DMSO, 100%) controls to yield percentage image-based cell viabilities.…”
Section: Inference and Drug Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each drug, 10 percentage image-based cell viabilities (5 concentrations, duplicates) were converted to percentage inhibition values and used to fit a curve model based on the Hill equation (namely, a generalized 5-parameter logistic curve model in the log-concentration domain [42] having an asymmetry coefficient). The curve model was then integrated in the log-concentration domain to yield the which was then converted to an in-house-developed DSS (DSS asym , [40]) inspired by [43,Fig. 1], using an automated drug-scoring pipeline such as previously shown by others [43], [44], [45], [46].…”
Section: Inference and Drug Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%