2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-18560-1_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iterative Solution of Linear Variational Problems in Hilbert Spaces: Some Conjugate Gradients Success Stories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existence of such an index is justified using Lemma 2 for r = j 2 and ζ = ζ . Now, by (38) and using the same argument as in the proof of Lemma 2, where we have shown that from (22) implies (31), we can infer that 2 3 a +1 ≤ α k+j+2 ≤ δ sup for every j 2 ≤ j ≤ j 3 − 2.…”
Section: General Casementioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existence of such an index is justified using Lemma 2 for r = j 2 and ζ = ζ . Now, by (38) and using the same argument as in the proof of Lemma 2, where we have shown that from (22) implies (31), we can infer that 2 3 a +1 ≤ α k+j+2 ≤ δ sup for every j 2 ≤ j ≤ j 3 − 2.…”
Section: General Casementioning
confidence: 78%
“…2. If α k+j+1 − λ < 0, then by (31) and using the fact that λ ≤ b +1 ≤ a +1 + η for λ ∈ I +1 , we obtain…”
Section: General Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several methods to solve Problems 2.1. In this article, we will make use of three methods: Landweber's (see, e.g., [15,Chapter 6]), Nesterov's (see [47,46]), and the conjugate gradient (CG) methods (see [29,27,13,34,26,20,48,16,4,22,42]). As we will see, the knowledge of the adjoint operator is essential for all of these iterative methods.…”
Section: Iterative Methods In Hilbert Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods were originally introduced in [20] and [30], respectively, for the case X = R n . Generalizations to infinite dimensional Hilbert spaces have been considered in [18,5,10,28,8,2,14,27] and the references therein, see also the references in [15]. In most of the above publications, a problem Bx = c was considered, where B was assumed to map X into itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, this complies with the present setting when we set B := RA, where R ∈ L(X * , X) denotes the Riesz isomorphism. This point of view was taken, at least implicitly, in [2,14,23] and in [3,Section 3]. In the present paper, we prefer the setting (1.1), and we keep the Riesz map explicit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%