Oceans 2006 2006
DOI: 10.1109/oceans.2006.307060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iterative Reception for Acoustic Underwater MIMO Communications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Nordenvaad and Oberg (2006), the authors consider the channel as a 1-rate code and use turbo decoding framework to decode the MIMO signals. A widely linear model of the Alamouti code was used for joint equalization and decoding, with a linear equalizer chosen for its low complexity.…”
Section: E Spatial Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Nordenvaad and Oberg (2006), the authors consider the channel as a 1-rate code and use turbo decoding framework to decode the MIMO signals. A widely linear model of the Alamouti code was used for joint equalization and decoding, with a linear equalizer chosen for its low complexity.…”
Section: E Spatial Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Limited by the scarce bandwidth, the pursuit of high data rate in UAC leverages the multi-input multi-output (MIMO) scheme (see, e.g., Refs. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. With sufficient diversity, MIMO systems offer enhanced reliability and/or increased data rates compared to their single-input counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4]- [8]. STBC for underwater acoustic channels has been considered for both single-carrier systems [9], and multi-carrier systems [10], [11]. Reference [9] discusses a jointly optimized MIMO-DFE with spacetime trellis codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [9] discusses a jointly optimized MIMO-DFE with spacetime trellis codes. In [10], maximum likelihood detection was considered, while [11] considered iterative equalization and decoding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%