2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3037807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iterative Receiver Design for Probabilistic Constellation Shaping in ISI Channel

Abstract: This paper investigates the receiver design for probabilistic constellation shaping signaling over inter-symbol interference channel. The key component performing the constellation shaping is an adjustable distribution matcher, and the probabilistic shaping system is capable to adapt to variable data rates by adjusting the distribution match rate rather than the modulation or coding mode. In this paper, we resort to distinct techniques to derive two iterative receivers operating in time domain. Shaped-BCJR is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This equalizer is ideal, especially for reducing the symbol error probability. To calculate the LLR a posteriori L(u i |y ), it was used the trellis representation associated with the transmission on the selective channel in frequency [38]. By applying the Bayes relation, the relation for LLR can be written in the sense of Equation (1).…”
Section: Log-map Equalizermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This equalizer is ideal, especially for reducing the symbol error probability. To calculate the LLR a posteriori L(u i |y ), it was used the trellis representation associated with the transmission on the selective channel in frequency [38]. By applying the Bayes relation, the relation for LLR can be written in the sense of Equation (1).…”
Section: Log-map Equalizermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, numerical simulations need to be carried out to find the optimal ν such as in [7], [8], [30]. Nevertheless, the principle of the PCS is to reduce H such that the achievable rate falls below the true capacity of the channel, which then yields significant BLER improvements [29]. However, with increasing ν, the effective modulation-order is decreased and the BLER can be made arbitrarily small for any channel.…”
Section: When Can Pcs Provide Gains In Throughput?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, the analysis of PCS is mostly focused on theoretical shaping-gains, which assumes a system that operates close to the capacity with optimal coding and decoding in Shannon sense. In practice, the system can operate far away from the capacity-bound [28], especially with a multi-input multi-output (MIMO) transmission under a fading channel, and further with a finite code-length [38], [39], [49]. To be able to make fair comparisons between PCS-QAM and Uniform-QAM with practical systems, we generalized the shaping-gain to be: Either the SNR-gain with a PCS-QAM when it attains the same throughput as a Uniform-QAM, or the rate-increment with a PCS-QAM compared to a Uniform-QAM at the same SNR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%