Handbook of Design in Educational Technology
DOI: 10.4324/9780203075227.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iterative Context Engineering to Inform the Design of Intelligent Exploratory Learning Environments for the Classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We referred to this approach as 'iterative context engineering' (see [10]) because we 'engineered' settings that gave teacher participants the opportunity to experience first-hand what it would mean to have access to such TA tools and, therefore, to offer deeper insights in susbequent one-to-one interviews. Based on these interviews, but also through feedback from our general teacher advisory group, a set of Usage Scenarios for the whole suite of TA tools were identified and the tools were refined accordingly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We referred to this approach as 'iterative context engineering' (see [10]) because we 'engineered' settings that gave teacher participants the opportunity to experience first-hand what it would mean to have access to such TA tools and, therefore, to offer deeper insights in susbequent one-to-one interviews. Based on these interviews, but also through feedback from our general teacher advisory group, a set of Usage Scenarios for the whole suite of TA tools were identified and the tools were refined accordingly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recognised that in‐depth understanding of teachers' requirements for the TA tools necessitated observing and analysing situations of actual usage context. We, therefore, adopted a “contextual design” approach (Holtzblatt & Beyer, ) to engineer situations that gave teacher participants the opportunity to experience first‐hand what it would mean to have access to such tools and, therefore, to offer deeper insights in subsequent one‐to‐one interviews with the research team (Mavrikis et al ., ). This approach helped address the twofold challenge that expert teachers do not necessarily have the data literacy skills or understanding of the potential of LA to contribute to design decisions or to provide feedback without first using prototypes of the TA tools themselves.…”
Section: Design and Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We have previously outlined our iterative design methodology both in the first generative phase of ideation (Gutierrez Santos, Geraniou, et al ., ; Pearce‐Lazard et al ., ) and in later stages of prototyping, testing and evaluation (Mavrikis et al ., ), recognising from the outset the need for collaboration with teachers from early on and throughout the process. Revisiting our work, our design and evaluation approach for the TA tools resembles the LATUX workflow put forward for designing and deploying awareness tools in the classroom (Martinez‐Maldonado et al ., ).…”
Section: Design and Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations