2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0207(20001030)49:6<751::aid-nme972>3.0.co;2-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iterative algorithms for impressed cathodic protection systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to find the corrosion rate at any point on a cathodically protected metallic structure submerged in an electrolyte (most frequently ground or seawater), a corrosion engineer needs to know the potential distribution over the electrolyte/structure interface. Today, the calculation of current and potential distribution is considered an indispensable means for study of cathodic protection (CP) systems and improvement of their reliability 1–25. Traditional CP design methods are mostly based on simple empirical formulas that require the use of large safety factors and rely, to a great extent, on the engineer's experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to find the corrosion rate at any point on a cathodically protected metallic structure submerged in an electrolyte (most frequently ground or seawater), a corrosion engineer needs to know the potential distribution over the electrolyte/structure interface. Today, the calculation of current and potential distribution is considered an indispensable means for study of cathodic protection (CP) systems and improvement of their reliability 1–25. Traditional CP design methods are mostly based on simple empirical formulas that require the use of large safety factors and rely, to a great extent, on the engineer's experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern CP design methods utilize explicit mathematical modelling. In general, the complexity of geometry and polarization behaviour of CP systems necessitates the use of numerical methods such as: the finite difference method (FDM) 1, finite element method (FEM) 2–5 and the boundary element method (BEM) 6–23. Among these methods, BEM is the most suitable for CP problems for two reasons: (i) unlike FDM and FEM, BEM requires discretization only of the boundaries of the system and not of the space occupied by the electrolytic medium and (ii) in an infinite system, discretization of the boundary at infinity is avoided by assuming an unknown constant potential at that boundary and by imposing the conservation of current between the anodes and cathodes which insures that there is no loss of current to infinity 9.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%