EAEG/SEG Summer Workshop - Construction of 3-D Macro Velocity-Depth Models 1994
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201407571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iterative 3D Depth Model Building via One-Pass 3D Depth Migration

Abstract: With the advent of steep-dip non-dispersive Isotropie 3D time and depth migration algorithms, the ability to image complex structures has entered a riew phase. However, the most important issue in subsurface imaging is nor the migration algorithm, but the elaboration of the subsurface velocity model. Many conventional approaches to obtaining a migration velocity field involve Dix inversion of RMS stacking veloeities. with appropriate editing and smoothing, leading to image ray, or normal ray map migration of p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With each technique, there are various theoretical or practical limitations. For example, the poststack layer-stripping approach (Jones, 1993) presupposes that the velocities are known, and then updates the layer geometries. The Deregowski-loop (Deregowski, 1990) allocates a vertical 1D velocity estimate to an incorrect spatial location; the coherency scan ('inversion') technique supposes constant velocities within the 3D ray-bundle (Reshef, 1994); 3D Tomographic inversion (Diet, et al, 1994) supposes a smooth model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With each technique, there are various theoretical or practical limitations. For example, the poststack layer-stripping approach (Jones, 1993) presupposes that the velocities are known, and then updates the layer geometries. The Deregowski-loop (Deregowski, 1990) allocates a vertical 1D velocity estimate to an incorrect spatial location; the coherency scan ('inversion') technique supposes constant velocities within the 3D ray-bundle (Reshef, 1994); 3D Tomographic inversion (Diet, et al, 1994) supposes a smooth model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%