1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf01109688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iterations of rational functions and the distribution of the values of the Poincar� functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are a variety of methods which can be used to study the value distribution of meromorphic solutions of the Schröder equation (1.1). Eremenko and Sodin [9] used methods from complex dynamics to show that the Valiron and Nevanlinna deficient values of meromorphic solutions of the autonomous Schröder equation (1.1) always coincide with the exceptional values of R(z). Ishizaki and Yanagihara [19] constructed an example showing that this is not true in general for the non-autonomous Schröder equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a variety of methods which can be used to study the value distribution of meromorphic solutions of the Schröder equation (1.1). Eremenko and Sodin [9] used methods from complex dynamics to show that the Valiron and Nevanlinna deficient values of meromorphic solutions of the autonomous Schröder equation (1.1) always coincide with the exceptional values of R(z). Ishizaki and Yanagihara [19] constructed an example showing that this is not true in general for the non-autonomous Schröder equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of iterations, Theorem 2 was proved by Brolin [2] (for polynomials), Lyubich [16] and Freire-Lopes-Mañé [9]. For the other proofs, see also Tortrat [27], Erëmenko-Sodin [6], Hubbard-Papadopol [12], and Fornaess and Sibony [8]. Theorem 2 can be also proven by Fornaess and Sibony's argument in the proof of [8], Theorem 6.1, where they used a crucial contradiction.…”
Section: Example 119mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Valiron has shown that the non-autonomous Schröder q-difference equation f (qz) = R z, f (z) , (1.1) where R(z, f (z)) is rational in both arguments, admits meromorphic solutions if q ∈ C is suitably chosen [13]. The property of meromorphic solutions of (1.1) is deeply investigated during the last decades, see for instance [3,7,10,11]. In 1998, Bergweiler et al [2] pointed out that transcendental meromorphic solutions f (z) of the functional equation n j=0 a j (z) f c j z = Q (z), (1.2) where 0 < |c| < 1 is a complex number, a j (z), j = 0, 1, 2, .…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%