2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10951-013-0351-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iterated Local Search for single-machine scheduling with sequence-dependent setup times to minimize total weighted tardiness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, ILS-RVND F ast found or improved the average solutions of ILS XLC , ILS-RVND SBP and LOX⊕B in only 1.9, 4.1 and 3.0 seconds, respectively, on average. It is worth mentioning that the average solutions of ILS XLC in Xu et al (2013) and LOX⊕B in Xu et al (2014) were obtained in 100 seconds on an Intel Core i3 3.10 GHz with 2.0 GB of RAM, whereas the average solutions of ILS-RVND SBP were obtained in 23.4 seconds on an Intel Core i5 3.20 GHz with 4.0 GB of RAM. The hardware configuration of these two machines is slightly inferior than the one used in our experiments (Intel Core i7 with 3.40 GHz and 16 GB of RAM), and thus does not justify the considerable difference in terms of CPU time between ILS-RVND F ast and the three other methods.…”
Section: Ddementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, ILS-RVND F ast found or improved the average solutions of ILS XLC , ILS-RVND SBP and LOX⊕B in only 1.9, 4.1 and 3.0 seconds, respectively, on average. It is worth mentioning that the average solutions of ILS XLC in Xu et al (2013) and LOX⊕B in Xu et al (2014) were obtained in 100 seconds on an Intel Core i3 3.10 GHz with 2.0 GB of RAM, whereas the average solutions of ILS-RVND SBP were obtained in 23.4 seconds on an Intel Core i5 3.20 GHz with 4.0 GB of RAM. The hardware configuration of these two machines is slightly inferior than the one used in our experiments (Intel Core i7 with 3.40 GHz and 16 GB of RAM), and thus does not justify the considerable difference in terms of CPU time between ILS-RVND F ast and the three other methods.…”
Section: Ddementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our proposed strategy enables the use of a large number of neighborhoods, such as moving blocks of consecutive jobs, which is likely to lead to high quality solutions. In fact, Xu et al (2013) showed that this type of neighborhood may indeed lead to better solutions for problem 1|s ij | w j T j .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 This benchmark set has been used by many researchers for a variety of search algorithms, such as dynamic programming [34], neighborhood search [24], iterated local search [39], valuebiased stochastic sampling [14], genetic algorithms [7], simulated annealing [8], ant colony optimization [23], etc.…”
Section: Sequence-dependent Setup Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic idea is to use larger neighborhood move operators rather than the swap and insertion move operators. Relying on this idea, Xu et al [45] presented a neighborhood structure called a Block Move in which l consecutive jobs (called a block) are inserted into another position in the sequence. They represent a block move by a triplet (i, k, l), where i represents the position of the first job of the block, k denotes the target position of the block to be inserted and l represents the size of the block.…”
Section: Variable Block Insertion Heuristicmentioning
confidence: 99%