2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ITEP: An integrated toolkit for exploration of microbial pan-genomes

Abstract: BackgroundComparative genomics is a powerful approach for studying variation in physiological traits as well as the evolution and ecology of microorganisms. Recent technological advances have enabled sequencing large numbers of related genomes in a single project, requiring computational tools for their integrated analysis. In particular, accurate annotations and identification of gene presence and absence are critical for understanding and modeling the cellular physiology of newly sequenced genomes. Although … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
83
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…SnpEff (16) was used to annotate SNPs as falling into protein-encoding (coding DNA sequence [CDS]) or non-protein-encoding regions, with the former also designated synonymous or nonsynonymous SNPs. The CDS SNPs were also annotated as core genome versus accessory genome by searching against a list of core genes obtained from a Markov clustering (MCL) method implemented in ITEP (Integrated Toolkit for Exploration of microbial Pan-genomes) (17). In short, a gene presence-absence matrix was constructed for finished genomes used in this study, using an MCL inflation value of 2.0 and a BLAST maxbit score of 0.4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SnpEff (16) was used to annotate SNPs as falling into protein-encoding (coding DNA sequence [CDS]) or non-protein-encoding regions, with the former also designated synonymous or nonsynonymous SNPs. The CDS SNPs were also annotated as core genome versus accessory genome by searching against a list of core genes obtained from a Markov clustering (MCL) method implemented in ITEP (Integrated Toolkit for Exploration of microbial Pan-genomes) (17). In short, a gene presence-absence matrix was constructed for finished genomes used in this study, using an MCL inflation value of 2.0 and a BLAST maxbit score of 0.4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conservation of the genes that are differentially expressed between MeOH and acetate growth. Each vertical bar indicates that a homolog for the differentially expressed gene exists in the indicated species (computed as the bidirectional best hits functionality in the ITEP software [92] with an E-value cut-off of 10 −5 for a database of ∼125000 proteins). Most differentially expressed genes are highly conserved among the Methanosarcinales ; however a core set of genes are conserved across all methanogens …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Integrated Toolkit for Exploration of Microbial Pan-genomes (ITEP) was used to compare conservation of differentially expressed genes [92]. ITEP was used to construct a database of ∼60 methanogens with published complete or nearly complete genomes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ITEP database [45] of 221 archaea, including each of the organisms in Table 1, was constructed using the default parameters. Briefly, ITEP is a software toolkit for examining microbial pan-genomes that provides functionality for constructing a BLAST database and querying protein family prediction, ortholog detection, and analysis of functional domains.…”
Section: Comparison Of Metabolic Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%