2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Item wording effects in self-report measures and reading achievement: Does removing careless respondents help?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, Schmitt and Allik (2005) and Hooper et al (2013) disclosed that reverse items were interpreted differently across countries. The mentioned contradiction may also be associated with the sample characteristics because the factors such as reading achievements (Bulut & Bulut, 2022;Michaelides, 2019), age levels (Bulut, 2021;Marsh 1986) and cognitive abilities (Gnambs & Schroeders, 2020) The results of the study indicated that internal consistency coefficient of Form-RN was lower than that of the other two versions. The facts that the reliability coefficient of Form-RN is lower than that of Form-P are coherent with those found by other researchers (Bourque & Shen, 2005;Carlson, 2011;Coleman, 2013;Ebesutani et al, 2012;Johnson et al, 2004;Roszkowski & Soven, 2010;Salazar, 2015;Suárez-Alvarez, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, Schmitt and Allik (2005) and Hooper et al (2013) disclosed that reverse items were interpreted differently across countries. The mentioned contradiction may also be associated with the sample characteristics because the factors such as reading achievements (Bulut & Bulut, 2022;Michaelides, 2019), age levels (Bulut, 2021;Marsh 1986) and cognitive abilities (Gnambs & Schroeders, 2020) The results of the study indicated that internal consistency coefficient of Form-RN was lower than that of the other two versions. The facts that the reliability coefficient of Form-RN is lower than that of Form-P are coherent with those found by other researchers (Bourque & Shen, 2005;Carlson, 2011;Coleman, 2013;Ebesutani et al, 2012;Johnson et al, 2004;Roszkowski & Soven, 2010;Salazar, 2015;Suárez-Alvarez, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Also, Williams and Swanson (2001) (cited in Weems et al, 2006) found a similar relationship for adults. Likewise, Bulut and Bulut (2022) revealed that the severity of item wording effect that emerges because of reverse items is related to the reading ability. Hooper et al (2013) audited the behavior of reverse items on the Confidence in Mathematics Scale administered to students in TIMSS 2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation