2013
DOI: 10.1093/jssam/smt019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Item Sum: A New Technique for Asking Quantitative Sensitive Questions

Abstract: This article contributes to an ongoing debate about how to measure sensitive topics in population surveys. We propose a novel technique that can be applied to the measurement of quantitative sensitive variables: the item sum technique (IST). This method is closely related to the item count technique (ICT), which was developed for the measurement of dichotomous sensitive items. First, we provide a description of our new technique and discuss how data collected by the IST can be analyzed. Second, we present the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…how many hours they spend per month herding, 334 farming and hunting). However, because respondents in the baseline group only report the sum from 335 non-sensitive activities, the extent of the sensitive behaviour can be calculated from the mean 336 difference of answers between the two subsamples (Trappmann et al, 2014). required to report the total number of items that apply to them without identifying any individual item.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…how many hours they spend per month herding, 334 farming and hunting). However, because respondents in the baseline group only report the sum from 335 non-sensitive activities, the extent of the sensitive behaviour can be calculated from the mean 336 difference of answers between the two subsamples (Trappmann et al, 2014). required to report the total number of items that apply to them without identifying any individual item.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decisive point in the IST is how to split the total sample in to the LL sample and SL sample. Trappmann et al (2014) allocated the same number of units to each sample irrespective of the vari-…”
Section: The Item Sum Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Chaudhuri and Christofides (2013) proposed a generalization to ICT for estimating a quantitative sensitive variable. Trappmann et al (2014) named this technique as item sum technique (IST). Perri et al (2018) discussed the optimal sample size allocation in the IST.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To address this situation, Chaudhuri and Christofides (2013) proposed a generalization of the ICT that can be used to estimate the mean (or the total) of a quantitative variable. Trappmann, Krumpal, Kirchner, and Jann (2014) called this variant the item sum technique (IST) and used it in a survey to estimate the amount of undeclared work in Germany. The IST works in a similar way to the ICT and offers a promising tool for dealing with sensitive issues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%