1992
DOI: 10.1086/209280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Item Context and the Stability of Entity-Based and Attribute-Based Multiattribute Scaling Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One group received the measuring instrument requiring them to rate all attributes of a brand before moving to the next brand. This noncomparative format is so-called the "entity-based format" by Teas and Wong (1992). The second group received the instrument that required them to rate all the three brands on one attribute before moving to the next attribute.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One group received the measuring instrument requiring them to rate all attributes of a brand before moving to the next brand. This noncomparative format is so-called the "entity-based format" by Teas and Wong (1992). The second group received the instrument that required them to rate all the three brands on one attribute before moving to the next attribute.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second group received the instrument that required them to rate all the three brands on one attribute before moving to the next attribute. This comparative format is also termed the "attribute-based format" (Teas and Wong 1992).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barnard and Ehrenberg 1990;Teas and Wong 1992). Relative measures require judgments that use some specified reference point (e.g., "How likely is it that brand X is more durable than brand Y?…”
Section: Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"), unlike nonrelative measures (e.g., "Is Brand A long lasting? "), which lack an explicit point of reference in their response frames (see, for example, Barnard and Ehrenberg 1990;Teas and Wong 1992).…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%