2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Italian version of the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire. Psychometric proprieties and measurement invariance across sex, BMI-status and age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
78
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
12
78
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the variability of both current and agehistorical variables within BED population is well documented [73,74], and mean values of both dietary restraint and BMI for BED cases are quite close to those observed in other clinical studies [76,77], [73]. Since the mean age of our BED participants at the time of assessment is consistent with that reported in several Italian studies [76,78], but lower than that of American studies (ranging from 38 to 48 years) [73], the possibility that Italians with BED are less tolerant of their overweight condition [78,79] and thus seek treatment more often than their US counterparts should not be ruled out. However, future studies are needed to corroborate this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Nevertheless, the variability of both current and agehistorical variables within BED population is well documented [73,74], and mean values of both dietary restraint and BMI for BED cases are quite close to those observed in other clinical studies [76,77], [73]. Since the mean age of our BED participants at the time of assessment is consistent with that reported in several Italian studies [76,78], but lower than that of American studies (ranging from 38 to 48 years) [73], the possibility that Italians with BED are less tolerant of their overweight condition [78,79] and thus seek treatment more often than their US counterparts should not be ruled out. However, future studies are needed to corroborate this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…11 The analyses were performed in Mplus 6.12 [60], using ML estimation (see footnote 7) on the covariance matrix and mean vector (MACS); for more information and the advantages of the MACS analysis, see Byrne [41]. Because of the v 2 test's dependency and sensitivity on sample size and model complexity, which may result in significant changes in fit even when such changes are diminutive [41,68], we presented the v 2 values (Table 3), but we did not interpret them as indicators of fit, in line with prior research [44,62]. In order to evaluate the degree of ME/I, the invariance models (Models 1-3) were assessed comparatively [41] by examining the changes (D) in CFI, RMSEA, and SRMR [57]; if DCFI B .010, DRMSEA B .015, and DSRMR B .030 for tests of factor loading invariance, and DCFI B .010, DRMSEA B .015, and DSRMR B .010 for tests of intercept invariance, then ME/I is demonstrated [68].…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The two English versions of the Italian-SAAS were compared and the few inconsistencies highlighted were removed in a further translation and back-translation comparison process until the two versions were identical [50]. The items of the final Italian SAAS (Table 1) did not show any meaningful differences from the original English version, as also confirmed by two independent professional translators [44,50].…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations