2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2016.09.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Italian domination in trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar constructive characterizations of trees for different domination related parameters or properties have been presented in e.g. Alvarado et al (2016), Henning and Klostermeyer (2017), Henning and Marcon (2016), and Rad (2017). Our characterization is based on four simple operations.…”
Section: Corollary 6 Let G = ((A B) E G ) Be a Connected Bipartite supporting
confidence: 53%
“…Similar constructive characterizations of trees for different domination related parameters or properties have been presented in e.g. Alvarado et al (2016), Henning and Klostermeyer (2017), Henning and Marcon (2016), and Rad (2017). Our characterization is based on four simple operations.…”
Section: Corollary 6 Let G = ((A B) E G ) Be a Connected Bipartite supporting
confidence: 53%
“…The sum w f = ∑ v∈V(G) f (v) is denoted the weight of a Roman {2}-dominating function, and the minimum weight of a Roman {2}-dominating function f is the Roman {2}-domination number, denoted by γ {R2} (G). Roman {2}-domination is a generalization of Roman domination that has also studied by Henning and Klostermeyer [8] with the name Italian domination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chellali et al [7] initiated the study of a variant of Roman dominating functions, call Roman {2}-dominating functions, which is the same as W2DFs. Henning et al [8] named the new concept Italian domination. The definition of the new domination is the following.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%