2011
DOI: 10.1002/nml.20048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Italian corporate foundations and the challenge of multiple stakeholder interests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, although studies have established charitable foundations as authentic organizations, not simply a façade (Herlin & Pedersen, 2013;Husted & Allen, 2007;ReyGarcia, Martin-Cavanna, & Alvarez-Gonzalez, 2012), researchers have only recently begun to examine the organizational issues involved in replacing in-house social initiatives with foundations, as well as the latter's role in CSR value co-creation (Castro-Martinez & Jackson, 2015;Misener & Babiak, 2015;Pedrini & Minciullo, 2011;Walters & Panton, 2014). The switch from in-house to independent organizations is not necessarily a straightforward one, as charitable foundations and their founding companies do not automatically share common goals or stakeholder agendas, making for a relationship that is not always conflict-free (Anagnostopoulos & Shilbury, 2013;Westhues & Einwiller, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although studies have established charitable foundations as authentic organizations, not simply a façade (Herlin & Pedersen, 2013;Husted & Allen, 2007;ReyGarcia, Martin-Cavanna, & Alvarez-Gonzalez, 2012), researchers have only recently begun to examine the organizational issues involved in replacing in-house social initiatives with foundations, as well as the latter's role in CSR value co-creation (Castro-Martinez & Jackson, 2015;Misener & Babiak, 2015;Pedrini & Minciullo, 2011;Walters & Panton, 2014). The switch from in-house to independent organizations is not necessarily a straightforward one, as charitable foundations and their founding companies do not automatically share common goals or stakeholder agendas, making for a relationship that is not always conflict-free (Anagnostopoulos & Shilbury, 2013;Westhues & Einwiller, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This solution shows that even when customers and employees do not participate in philanthropy (causal conditions 4 and 5), the culture in the country where the headquarters are located encourages hotel groups to cooperate with NGOs (causal condition 1) and undertake philanthropy directly. Hotel groups continue to invest in their communities because it is good for their public image (Hallak et al, 2012) or because of an ethical belief of giving back to their communities (Pedrini & Minciullo, 2011). S5 concludes that, contrary to H5, an altruistic culture in the country (causal condition 6) is a sufficient condition to assure group participation, even when employee involvement (causal condition 5) does not appear as a causal condition.…”
Section: Why Hotel Groups Get Involved In Their Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Concerning the second causal condition, Pedrini and Minciullo (2011) list the three main reasons for firms to develop foundations, which are an ethical way to give back to the community, improve a firm's reputation, and increase employee motivation. Evidence of firms participating in their communities through foundations can be found in literature (Gautier & Pache, 2015;Van der Voort, Glac, & Meijs, 2009).…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IBFs constitute a particular type of grant-giving, not-for-profit foundation (Pedrini and Minciullo, 2011) that is unique to Italy due to its rules governing stakeholder orientation obligations. Currently, IBFs are primarily engaged in the areas of art and culture, assistance to the underprivileged, education, support to voluntary organisations, healthcare, and scientific research.…”
Section: Italian Banking Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%