SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition 1984
DOI: 10.2118/13159-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Itabirite: An Alternative Weighting Material for Heavy Oil-Base Muds

Abstract: This paper assesses the benefits of itabirite (hematite) as a weighting material in heavy oil base systems. A laboratory investigation was conducted to obtain information on a comparative basis between barite and itabirite. Rheological properties and abrasiveness were studied and field results were predicted. As a result of the lab studies, lower field rhe-ology (i.e., PV, YP and Gel Strength) and a slightly more abrasive nature are predicted. Increased penetration rates and improved bit hydraul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weighting material is simply a material with high specific gravity, which is used in the drilling fluid or cementing slurry to increase the density. There are several examples of weighting materials including ilmenite, hematite, barite, calcium carbonate, ferromagnetic magnetite, siderite, galena, anhydrous calcium sulfate, and so forth. ,− The criteria for choosing the weighting material include the availability, cost, removal process, compatibility with other components in the drilling fluid, formation type that will be drilled, and so forth. The most common weighting material is barite …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weighting material is simply a material with high specific gravity, which is used in the drilling fluid or cementing slurry to increase the density. There are several examples of weighting materials including ilmenite, hematite, barite, calcium carbonate, ferromagnetic magnetite, siderite, galena, anhydrous calcium sulfate, and so forth. ,− The criteria for choosing the weighting material include the availability, cost, removal process, compatibility with other components in the drilling fluid, formation type that will be drilled, and so forth. The most common weighting material is barite …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting inconsistent drilling fluid properties will eventually lead to wellbore instability, pipe sticking, circulation losses, and significant increase in drilling costs [15][16][17][18]. Accordingly, the industry seeks for practical solutions to mitigate these serious issues using alternative applicable weighting materials that provide high-density mud such as hematite, ilmenite, and Micromax [19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known as an absorbent, blasting, and adhesive agent. Hematite was firstly proposed as a weighting agent by Haaland et al [26]; then, its utilization in drilling fluids grows significantly showing lower solid content, significant ROP improvement, acid solubility, and low toxicity [19][20][21][22][23]. The relatively high abrasiveness of hematite is reduced by micronizing its particles [27], which helps in improving the filtration and rheology performance as well [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hematite (Fe 2 O 3 ) is a reddish-brown powder and electrically conductive with a molecular weight of 159.69 and a specific gravity of 4.9–5.3 g/cm 3 . It is commonly used as a blasting agent, absorbent, and adhesive agent and was recently introduced and applied as a weighting material showing technical benefits with a low solid content, as the field and laboratory implementation validated the low toxicity, ROP improvement, and acid-solubility of hematite. Moreover, the micronized particles of hematite showed a positive impact on rheology and filtration performance besides the advantages of iron oxide existence . However in HP/HT wells, solid sagging was still encountered, particularly, at mud density higher or equal to 14 ppg and temperature greater than or equal to 250 °F for different applied pressure ranges. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%