2009
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

It takes two to tango: reproductive skew and social correlates of male mating success in a lek-breeding bird

Abstract: Variance in reproductive success among individuals is a defining characteristic of many social vertebrates. Yet, our understanding of which male attributes contribute to reproductive success is still fragmentary in most cases. Male-male reproductive coalitions, where males jointly display to attract females, are of particular interest to evolutionary biologists because one male appears to forego reproduction to assist the social partner. By examining the relationship between social behaviour and reproductive s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
130
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
130
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In chimpanzees, maternal brothers affiliate and cooperate, but there also are a large number of affiliative and cooperative dyads that are unrelated or only distantly related, suggesting that cooperation provides direct benefits to the individuals (13). Fitness benefits associated with unrelated male coalitions also have been shown in Assamese macaques (33) and in several nonprimate species, including lions (Panthera leo) (34), and manakins (Pipra filicaudata) (35). Indirect fitness benefits also may play a role, however.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In chimpanzees, maternal brothers affiliate and cooperate, but there also are a large number of affiliative and cooperative dyads that are unrelated or only distantly related, suggesting that cooperation provides direct benefits to the individuals (13). Fitness benefits associated with unrelated male coalitions also have been shown in Assamese macaques (33) and in several nonprimate species, including lions (Panthera leo) (34), and manakins (Pipra filicaudata) (35). Indirect fitness benefits also may play a role, however.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The results of the change-point analysis based on GPS data indicated that the Guinea baboon society consists of three structural levels. First, the algorithm detected a change point-reflecting dyads that associated more than 68% of the time (n = 12); these dyads were classified as belonging to the same "party," The mean party size was 25 individuals (range, [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Second, we found a significant split separating dyads that spent up to 12% of the time together.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we advance our previous work on manakin social networks [5,6] by using a proximity logging approach to characterize weighted social networks. Two complementary measures of average network structure and topology suggest that males are both closely connected (path length) and highly clustered (clustering coefficient), with leks probably serving as densely interconnected neighbourhoods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, wire-tailed manakins are cooperative lek-breeding birds that exhibit dynamic social behaviour in which territory males perform courtship displays alone, in a coalition with a non-territorial partner (floater), or in a coalition with another territory holder. Previous work using observational approaches has shown that display coalitions form the basis for complex networks and that network connectivity is a strong predictor of male fitness (social rise and reproductive success) [5,6]. Here, we test proximity data-loggers to quantify the frequency of social interactions, construct weighted networks and characterize variation in wire-tailed manakin social behaviour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, male partners coordinate their display elements, and these partnerships provide benefits to both non-territorial males (increased probability of territorial inheritance [9]) and territorial males (increased reproductive success [10]). While the frequency of cooperative partnerships varies both within and among males of different social status [11], all males engage in these partnerships, as they are an essential component of male fitness [9][10][11]. However, despite the cooperative benefits of display coalitions, these partnerships are also thought to play an important role in the establishment of dominance hierarchies as males compete for social status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%