2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2609-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IT services in a completely digitized radiological department: value and benefit of an in-house departmental IT group

Abstract: To analyze the benefit of a departmental IT group in comparison to support by hospital IT groups or system manufacturers in a completely digitized radiological department. The departmental IT group comprises a fulltime IT specialist, two student assistants and four clinical employees participating 1 day/week. For 18 months IT problems were quantified and specified according to urgency, responsibility and affected system by use of an intranet-based reporting system. For each IT service provider the performance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a large volume of studies that investigated the costeffectiveness of specific modalities of radiology, such as CT colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for colorectal screening, 146,147 full-field digital mammography versus screen film mammography, 148,149 and digitized radiological department versus traditional radiology, 150 although this latter is no longer an issue because PACS is widely accepted and implemented in radiology departments. We focus here on economic studies that investigated the benefits and costs of teleradiology versus traditional radiology, as shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Cost Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a large volume of studies that investigated the costeffectiveness of specific modalities of radiology, such as CT colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for colorectal screening, 146,147 full-field digital mammography versus screen film mammography, 148,149 and digitized radiological department versus traditional radiology, 150 although this latter is no longer an issue because PACS is widely accepted and implemented in radiology departments. We focus here on economic studies that investigated the benefits and costs of teleradiology versus traditional radiology, as shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Cost Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially in this context HIS-EPR and PACS have to be perceived as a tightly coupled pair which only together can achieve its objectives. Hence PACS is becoming one of the core systems of the hospital IT landscape and has to be considered an essential pillar together with the ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) and HIS-EPR systems which may also have implications on the support strategies [66,67]. In this process, the radiologist, with his dedicated PACS know-how, is a key player and partner for other departments, hospital administration and central IT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These more complex solutions are usually not available around the clock, and in our experience, they are commonly diagnosed only after other efforts have failed. True equipment failure requiring vendor intervention has been shown to take longer to resolve than failure requiring in-house intervention [15].…”
Section: The Majority Of Downtimes Can Be Solved By On-site It Staffmentioning
confidence: 99%