2019
DOI: 10.1177/194277861901200110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

It's time to recognize how men's careers benefit from sexually harassing women in academia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sexual harassment also occurs when male (and sometime female) colleagues dismiss your ideas publically only to use them later in their publications and talks; when women are consistently silenced and forced to be mansplained at mandatory faculty meetings; and when they are systemically denied tenure, justified by a committee who claims ‘a lack of confidence’ in a candidate’s research and teaching (Domosh, 2015; Mansfield et al, 2019). While some exclusionary practices within geographical knowledge production are quite egregious and frankly illegal (see Mansfield et al, 2019), others are ‘wrapped up in meritocratic veneer’ (from Domosh, 2015). As a result, female (and some minority male) geographers are compelled to do ‘defensive work’ (Mansfield et al, 2019).…”
Section: Intimate and Embodied Marginalizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sexual harassment also occurs when male (and sometime female) colleagues dismiss your ideas publically only to use them later in their publications and talks; when women are consistently silenced and forced to be mansplained at mandatory faculty meetings; and when they are systemically denied tenure, justified by a committee who claims ‘a lack of confidence’ in a candidate’s research and teaching (Domosh, 2015; Mansfield et al, 2019). While some exclusionary practices within geographical knowledge production are quite egregious and frankly illegal (see Mansfield et al, 2019), others are ‘wrapped up in meritocratic veneer’ (from Domosh, 2015). As a result, female (and some minority male) geographers are compelled to do ‘defensive work’ (Mansfield et al, 2019).…”
Section: Intimate and Embodied Marginalizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some exclusionary practices within geographical knowledge production are quite egregious and frankly illegal (see Mansfield et al, 2019), others are ‘wrapped up in meritocratic veneer’ (from Domosh, 2015). As a result, female (and some minority male) geographers are compelled to do ‘defensive work’ (Mansfield et al, 2019). As Mansfield et al make clear, defensive work is a direct result of the way,[s]exual harassment benefits men by systematically undermining women, even those not directly targeted…Lecherous professors harass bright female graduate students right out of academia, derailing their lives and impoverishing our field.…”
Section: Intimate and Embodied Marginalizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We take seriously the feminist contention that “academic brilliance and achievement is always already a collective endeavor,” and our experience suggests that transformative mentoring can produce unexpected benefits for both the mentor and the mentee (Mansfield et al. 2019). We draw inspiration from feminist anthropologists who are resisting and moving away from the colonial history of anthropology into critical engagement with social justice inside and outside academia.…”
Section: A Journey Of Six Years and Countingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extending the argument made by Mansfield et al (2019), it seems a component of abolishing ‘White men’ starts with naming the harm done by individuals who give foundation to the collective harm; raising voice from the shadows of the whisper network to center stage. Once corrupt individual behavior is more legible, putting the work of individuals in conversation with their actions facilitates broader forms of accountability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another step that Mansfield et al (2019) suggest that seems necessary in moving toward ‘an other geography’, and working toward the abolition of ‘White men’, is refusing to honor them with awards and recognitions from which to extend heteropatriarchy. In particular, they recommend that ‘we can institute new review requirements for disciplinary honors and other forms of institutional recognition’ (Mansfield et al, 2019: 85). The ‘we’ here is important, as many awards that prop up the institution of ‘White men’ are professional societies and universities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%