It's time to do more research on the <scp>attitude–behavior</scp> relation: A commentary on implicit attitude measures

Dai, Wenhao

doi:10.1002/wcs.1602

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The relationship between intention and behaviour is complex and requires further investigation (Dai & Albarracín, 2022 ). Nevertheless, extant evidence suggests that the effect of information exposure on attitude and behaviour change can be moderated by appeals to strong emotions such as fear and anger (Lambert et al, 2010 ; Tannenbaum et al, 2015 ), a prominent feature of much “fake news” (Ghanem et al, 2020 ; Vosoughi et al, 2018 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring the effects of misinformation exposure and beliefs on behavioural intentions: a COVID-19 vaccination study

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Misinformation has been a pressing issue since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, threatening our ability to effectively act on the crisis. Nevertheless, little is known about the actual effects of fake news on behavioural intentions. Does exposure to or belief in misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines affect people’s intentions to receive such a vaccine? This paper attempts to address this question via three preregistered experiments (N = 3463). In Study 1, participants (n = 1269) were exposed to fabricated pro- or anti-vaccine information or to neutral true information, and then asked about their intentions to get vaccinated. In Study 2, participants (n = 646) were exposed to true pro- and anti-vaccine information, while Study 3 (n = 1548) experimentally manipulated beliefs in novel misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines by increasing exposure to the information. The results of these three studies showed that exposure to false information about the vaccines had little effect on participants’ intentions to get vaccinated, even when multiple exposures led them to believe the headlines to be more accurate. An exploratory meta-analysis of studies 1 and 3, with a combined sample size of 2683, showed that exposure to false information both supporting and opposing COVID-19 vaccines actually increased vaccination intentions, though the effect size was very small. We conclude by cautioning researchers against equating exposure to misinformation or perceived accuracy of false news with actual behaviours.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring the effects of misinformation exposure and beliefs on behavioural intentions: a COVID-19 vaccination study

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, assessing prejudice and stereotyping is subject to two important limitations. First, individuals are hesitant to reveal socially unacceptable attitudes (Dai & Albarracín, 2022). Second, examining solely these facets disregards behavior, which is investigation, and writing-original draft and an equal role in data curation, formal analysis, methodology, project administration, resources, and writing-review and editing.…”

Section: Assessment Of Stigma In Health Professionalsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, assessing prejudice and stereotyping is subject to two important limitations. First, individuals are hesitant to reveal socially unacceptable attitudes (Dai & Albarracín, 2022). Second, examining solely these facets disregards behavior, which is the means through which stigma is communicated and the element that ultimately needs to be altered to decrease its impact (Corrigan & Shapiro, 2010).…”

Section: Stigma Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and evaluation of psychometric properties of the Humanized Care Behaviors in Health Personnel Scale.

Vielma-Aguilera,

Cova,

Ramírez-Vielma

et al. 2024

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interventions to reduce the stigma of health care personnel toward people with mental disorders have been generally evaluated fundamentally by improving attitudes and reducing the desire for a social distance toward this population. However, decreasing stigma should be accompanied by an increase in good treatment behaviors toward those affected. Humanization of care, which is understood as a friendly, respectful, and supportive relationship, could be an excellent way to evaluate the effectiveness of antistigma interventions. This requires reliable and valid instruments. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the humanized care behavior scale used in health care personnel. The study was quantitative and cross-sectional. The participants were a nonrandom sample of 217 health providers from 12 family health centers in Gran Concepcio ´n, Chile. An exploratory factorial analysis was applied to study the factorial structure, and Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's total omega coefficients were used to evaluate the internal consistency. The concurrent validity was assessed through a correlational analysis with three other scales. Regarding the results, the final scale comprised 16 items in two factors. There was an acceptable correlation between the two dimensions. The reliability indices for the total scale were high. Correlations between the total scale and its factors with the other scales used were in the expected direction. Consequently, the instrument developed is valid and reliable. It can be used to evaluate antistigma interventions and improve health personnel's humanization of care toward consultants with mental disorders. Public Significance StatementThis study evaluated a scale for assessing humanized care provided by health care personnel to individuals with mental disorders. Humanized care is defined as a friendly, respectful, and supportive relationship and is a crucial factor in reducing stigma associated with psychiatric diagnoses. The scale exhibited good psychometric properties, indicating its usefulness in evaluating nonstigmatized and humanized behavior toward people with mental disorders.

show abstract

“…consumption of green products) is subject to various influential factors beyond their attitude. Scholars have established that the social norm within a group, perceived as social pressure and expectations, plays a critical role in explaining attitude–behavior correspondence (Ajzen, 1985; Ajzen and Fishbein, 2000; Dai and Albarracín, 2022; Hogg and Smith, 2007; Smith et al , 2008; Terry et al , 2000). These studies indicate that attitudes are more likely to express themselves as behaviors if both the attitude and the corresponding behavior are normative in the in-group.…”

Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Revisiting consumer responses in situational animosity: a reference group perspective

Chang,

Fong,

Chen

2024

JPBM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study aims to investigate the role of interpersonal influence on consumer purchase decisions regarding foreign products, specifically by exploring consumers’ social reaction styles (acquisitive and protective) when confronted with normative pressures and their subsequent impact on consumers’ purchase behavior in the context of situational animosity. Design/methodology/approach Three studies were conducted in China to empirically examine the proposed research model. The US–China Chip War of 2022 was used as the research context for situational animosity, while the Japan–China relationship representing a stable animosity condition was used for contrast. Findings This study establishes the mediating role of perceived normative pressure in linking animosity attitudes to purchase avoidance in situational animosity. It also validates that consumers’ social reaction styles (acquisitive and protective) help predict distinct behavioral outcomes, holding significant implications for advancing research in the field of product and brand consumption. Originality/value This research provides a novel perspective by exploring consumers’ social reaction styles when dealing with normative pressure in situational animosity. The distinction between acquisitive and protective reaction styles adds depth and originality to the study. Moreover, this study examines consumer behavior in two distinct consumption contexts: switching intentions to local products and purchase intentions for products from offending countries in hidden consumption situations. This dual perspective offers a comprehensive exploration of consumers’ purchase behavior under normative pressure, contributing to the novelty of this research.

show abstract

It's time to do more research on the attitude–behavior relation: A commentary on implicit attitude measures

Cited by 4 publications

References 41 publications

Measuring the effects of misinformation exposure and beliefs on behavioural intentions: a COVID-19 vaccination study

Measuring the effects of misinformation exposure and beliefs on behavioural intentions: a COVID-19 vaccination study

Development and evaluation of psychometric properties of the Humanized Care Behaviors in Health Personnel Scale.

Revisiting consumer responses in situational animosity: a reference group perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About