Archival Futures 2018
DOI: 10.29085/9781783302192.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

It's the end of the archival profession as we know it, and I feel fine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2018) does not specifically discuss AI, but their suggestion that archives be understood as data collections to be “mined” is a nod to the technology that allows for the mining to occur. Theimer (2018) agrees with this sentiment, suggesting that archivists need to become data scientists. CAS provides one perspective most notably that the archival science focus on the nature of the record remains central moving forward (Marciano et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(2018) does not specifically discuss AI, but their suggestion that archives be understood as data collections to be “mined” is a nod to the technology that allows for the mining to occur. Theimer (2018) agrees with this sentiment, suggesting that archivists need to become data scientists. CAS provides one perspective most notably that the archival science focus on the nature of the record remains central moving forward (Marciano et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Moss et al. (2018) and Theimer (2018) specifically address the concept of archival expertise and how it may change in the context of AI, suggesting that expertise would grow to closely resemble data science.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Looking at implications of AI for the profession, [Theimer 2018] sketches a picture of the future of the profession in which numerous archive tasks can and will be taken over by machines and algorithms. This implies that archivists need to become "masters of data" but at the same time the profession has to focus more on "narrative, storytelling, meaning-making, context providing (...) outreach and education [which] will be more important than ever" [Theimer 2018]. [Rolan 2019] observe an emerging gap between archivists who are familiar with AI concepts and those who are not and stress the necessity of "retraining" to mitigate the knowledge and skills gap.…”
Section: Theoretical and Professional Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data science professionals are often transdisciplinary and able to bring information management and technical skills to their professions. Theimer (2018) argues that archivists are hindered without similar training. "We need to become, if we are not already, masters of data, or to use a less romantic title, data scientists.…”
Section: Transdisciplinary Appraisers Microcosms and Macrocosmsmentioning
confidence: 99%