2014
DOI: 10.1177/1076217514520966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

It’s Safe to Be Smart

Abstract: Gifted teenagers in middle and high school benefit from classroom environments that support their social and emotional development. Teachers of gifted adolescents may create classroom environments in which young people know it is safe to be smart and where they feel valued and respected for their intellect, creativity, and passions. By utilizing available strategies for creating such environments, teachers enhance the psychosocial well-being of gifted adolescents.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five empirical articles were reviewed, of which two were qualitative (Chan & Yuen, 2015;Wu et al, 2019) and three were quantitative (Jo & Ku, 2011;Kettler & Bower, 2017;Sak, 2013). Of the remaining articles, most (n = 16) were practitioner-focused and written with classroom teachers as the primary audience (Beason-Manes, 2018;Chandra Handa, 2015;Coxon, 2012;Firmender et al, 2017;Fletcher, 2011;Gavin & Casa, 2013;Groman, 2019;Hagge, 2017;Hébert et al, 2014;Hines et al, 2019;Schroth & Helfer, 2017;Scott, 2011;Senne et al, 2016;Shively et al, 2018;Thompson, 2017;Westberg & Leppien, 2018), but several (n = 5) were more theoretical in nature with a broader audience that included researchers and school personnel (Miller, 2012;Renzulli, 2012;Renzulli & Reis, 2012;Subotnik, 2015;Subotnik et al, 2011). Overall, the 26 articles described learning environments for gifted students with an emphasis on classroom systems that promote and support creativity and the creative process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Five empirical articles were reviewed, of which two were qualitative (Chan & Yuen, 2015;Wu et al, 2019) and three were quantitative (Jo & Ku, 2011;Kettler & Bower, 2017;Sak, 2013). Of the remaining articles, most (n = 16) were practitioner-focused and written with classroom teachers as the primary audience (Beason-Manes, 2018;Chandra Handa, 2015;Coxon, 2012;Firmender et al, 2017;Fletcher, 2011;Gavin & Casa, 2013;Groman, 2019;Hagge, 2017;Hébert et al, 2014;Hines et al, 2019;Schroth & Helfer, 2017;Scott, 2011;Senne et al, 2016;Shively et al, 2018;Thompson, 2017;Westberg & Leppien, 2018), but several (n = 5) were more theoretical in nature with a broader audience that included researchers and school personnel (Miller, 2012;Renzulli, 2012;Renzulli & Reis, 2012;Subotnik, 2015;Subotnik et al, 2011). Overall, the 26 articles described learning environments for gifted students with an emphasis on classroom systems that promote and support creativity and the creative process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students spent an extensive amount of time troubleshooting potential solutions and weeding out those that did not work. Authors recommend that educators build supportive environments in which high-ability students feel comfortable interacting with their ideas and with others while they reflect upon and evaluate their end goal (e.g., solution, product; Chandra Handa, 2015; Hébert et al, 2014;Renzulli, 2012;Westberg & Leppien, 2018) before moving forward with the best ideas.…”
Section: Integrating Creative Process Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations