2022
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘It's not just to treat everybody the same’: A social justice framework for caring for larger patients in healthcare practice

Abstract: Drawing on semi-structured interviews with larger bodied patients (n = 20) and their healthcare practitioners (n = 22) in Canada, this paper combines micro and macro approaches in outlining a social justice approach to caring for larger patients in healthcare practice.Theoretically, we draw upon structural competency and critical consciousness to address the question of how social justice is enacted, experienced, and understood in interactions between clinicians and larger patients.Our findings highlight four … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 68 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, legitimacy is also granted to practitioners— and the field of medicine, more broadly—such as in having social determinants recognised as integral to care. This is not to suggest that non‐clinical information goes unacknowledged (Buchbinder, 2017; Gutin, 2022; Lane, 2020; Pickersgill, 2020), or that clinicians never deviate from diagnostic protocol in response to nonclinical information (Kanagasingam et al., 2022; Whooley, 2010). Yet, individual practitioners’ propensities to recognise social determinants as important is fundamentally distinct from their having institutional recognition that legitimises these beliefs and facilitates actionable steps.…”
Section: Diagnoses Provide Legitimacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, legitimacy is also granted to practitioners— and the field of medicine, more broadly—such as in having social determinants recognised as integral to care. This is not to suggest that non‐clinical information goes unacknowledged (Buchbinder, 2017; Gutin, 2022; Lane, 2020; Pickersgill, 2020), or that clinicians never deviate from diagnostic protocol in response to nonclinical information (Kanagasingam et al., 2022; Whooley, 2010). Yet, individual practitioners’ propensities to recognise social determinants as important is fundamentally distinct from their having institutional recognition that legitimises these beliefs and facilitates actionable steps.…”
Section: Diagnoses Provide Legitimacymentioning
confidence: 99%