“It’s Not in Your Head”: Gaslighting, ‘Splaining, Victim Blaming, and Other Harmful Reactions to Microaggressions

Abstract

Secondary microaggressions refer to the ways in which people of historically dominant groups negate the realities of people of marginalized groups. Gaslighting describes the act of manipulating others to doubt themselves or question their own sanity; people confronted for committing microaggressions deny the existence of their biases, often convincing the targets of microaggressions to question their own perceptions. ‘Splaining (derived from mansplaining/Whitesplaining) is an act in which a person of a dominant group speaks for or provides rationale to people of marginalized groups about topics related to oppression or inequity. Victim blaming refers to assigning fault to people who experience violence or wrongdoing and is used as a tool to discredit people of marginalized groups who speak out against microaggressions or any injustices. Finally, abandonment and neglect refer to a bystander’s failure to address or acknowledge microaggressions. Although these terms are commonly known among marginalized communities (and frequently used in popular media), there is a dearth in academic literature that substantiates these phenomena and relates them to microaggressions. The purpose of this article is to review these concepts in the psychological literature and to demonstrate the psychological harm caused by these behaviors on interpersonal and systemic levels.

A student‐led qualitative study to explore dental undergraduates' understanding, experiences, and responses to racism in a dental school

“…The participants' experiences of these more subtle and hidden forms of interpersonal racism is consistent with previous studies in healthcare learning environments [35]. Although these covert forms of interpersonal racism may be unintentional and unconscious, they are often more insidious, causing individuals to question or doubt their experiences [36]. Studies have also shown the cumulative effects of microaggression negatively affecting students' mental health and learning [34,37].…”

When thriving requires effortful surviving: Delineating manifestations and resource expenditure outcomes of microaggressions for Black employees.

“…This is problematic because employees might not only be unable to fully remove and protect themselves from such encounters, but they may also feel powerless to address these harmful experiences due to anticipated economic backlash, jeopardized career progression, or compromised identity management goals. Recent work employs the term secondary microaggression to denote the harmful and invalidating responses that people of color receive when they confront microaggressions (Johnson et al, 2021). Taken together, these factors highlight that understanding and eradicating microaggressions in this context is critical.…”

Where Sex Meets Gender: How Sex and Gender Come Together to Cause Sex Differences in Mental Illness

“…Interpersonal aspects of our model include sex/gender differences related to insecure attachment, poor or negative social support ( 145 ), and victim blaming ( 146 ). Attachment is usually considered an intrapersonal factor, but we have included it in this category, as the quality of early attachments exerts a strong influence on subsequent relationships.…”