2021
DOI: 10.14512/gaia.30.4.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

It’s not enough to be right! The climate crisis, power, and the climate movement

Abstract: The demands of the climate movement ‐ for rapid and profound change ‐ are based on scientific findings and the political commitments to the Paris Agreement. The activists are, therefore, factually “right”. However, being right is not enough to justify or to accelerate the practical implementation of knowledge and decisions. We explain which social factors are at work, and how the climate movement can benefit if they incorporate these factors into actions for social change.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Pohlmann et al (2021) [41], the normalisation of climate-friendly behaviours in a given social group will not occur through the sum of individuals. Gamification thus often provides interactive spaces where reality can be experienced and transformed, which is a rich basis for knowledge creation (Kolb, 2014[42]).…”
Section: A Synergy During the Role-play Sessions And Influence Of The...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Pohlmann et al (2021) [41], the normalisation of climate-friendly behaviours in a given social group will not occur through the sum of individuals. Gamification thus often provides interactive spaces where reality can be experienced and transformed, which is a rich basis for knowledge creation (Kolb, 2014[42]).…”
Section: A Synergy During the Role-play Sessions And Influence Of The...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This political demand for structural action to address climate change is also increasingly expressed by members of the scientific community, for example, Pohlmann et al (2021) argue that the climate crisis is not simply one crisis among others and that it interconnects with a wide range of other political-economic challenges. Indeed, they stress that the difficulty of making the necessary social changes to address the climate crisis stems from ‘the centrality of fossil fuels and the material wealth derived from them’ in ‘prevailing structures of domination’ (Pohlmann et al, 2021: 232).…”
Section: Teaching Sustainability Criticallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there are a series of broader political faultlines around inequality in this wicked universality, exacerbated by the fact that those living in low-income countries are overwhelmingly least responsible for climate change and are under most immediate threat from it (Miller, 2017: 17). Given the importance of the sustainability paradox, we first explore different ways of engaging with, or sidestepping it, beginning with the influential SDGs and PRME framework, and then draw on the political economy intervention to highlight the need for a more politicised approach (Pohlmann et al, 2021). Following this, we argue that it is best to combine political economy perspectives with ecological and ecocentric approaches in management pedagogy, for which Haraway (2016) gives us some important conceptual resources to further develop.…”
Section: Teaching Sustainability Criticallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sum, it seems that the climate protest movement as it stands is not a major force in closing the implementation gap. However, new strategies could be taken up to more effectively exert pressure to overcome the salience of the burdens (Section 3.1.2) associated with implementation and to hold all levels of government accountable (Section 3.1.3;Pohlmann et al, 2021). Empirical evidence on the movement's impact on specific instruments is still missing.…”
Section: Climate Protestsmentioning
confidence: 99%