“It's a Jihad”: Justifying Violence towards the Ahmadiyya in Indonesia

Abstract

The concept of al-wala’ wa-l-bara’ (loyalty and disavowal) has become the ideology of modern Salafism; it is used to justify unfriendly relationships with non-Muslims. This concept is usually implemented by reserving love only for fellow Muslims and showing insularity towards non-Muslims. What is the ideological concept that guides some Muslims in their relationship with groups that are considered heretics? This article intends to scrutinize the theological matrix used by vigilante groups in their anti-heresy campaign or attacks on the Ahmadiyya. It also aims to determine why some people believe that persecuting the Ahmadiyya is a theologically justifiable idea. What theological and ideological reasons can be used to justify attacks against the Ahmadiyya community? How do they cope with the conflict between divine law and human/state law? This article argues that instead of feeling guilty, the perpetrators of faith-based violence often feel they have just fulfilled a good religious duty. Committing violence against religious groups deemed heretics is believed to be more than al-amr bi al-màrūf wa al-nahy `an al-munkar (“commanding right and forbidding wrong”)—it is a jihad. Violence is seen not as an illegal act, but as a “virtue” or an effort to save them from the punishment of God in Hell. In justifying the breaching of state law, the idea of a hierarchy in the law is constructed, i.e. state/human law is hierarchically lower than divine law, so attacking the Ahmadiyya is seen as a transgression of human law for the sake of upholding the divine view.

Toleransi Itu Mahal, Tidak Setiap Orang Mampu Dan Berani Membayarnya!

“…Banyak sekali tantangan yang dihadapi terkait aksi intoleransi, yang berdampak terhadap persekusi terhadap kelompok minoritas agama, pelarangan beribadah, pengrusakan tempat ibadah, pelarangan pendirian rumah ibadah, diskriminasi terhadap penganut kepercayaan, dan lain sebagainya. Nasib politik yang muram masih dirasakan kelompok minoritas agama atau minoritas dalam suatu agama, semisal komunitas Ahmadiyah, Syi'ah, penghayat kepercayaan, akibat beberapa persekusi tanpa penegakan hukum dan sampai sekarang belum dapat menemukan jalan penyelesaian (Burhani, 2021).…”

Cosmopolitan Nationalism (A Theoretical Review)

“…Cosmopolitan nationalism is an attitude that is concerned and always open to foreign cultures that enter but are still accompanied by loyalty to the country. This cosmopolitan nationalism has become a social trend that allows individuals and even a nation to exist in the world community globally while maintaining loyalty to the state, even though it is based on cosmopolitan nationalism, the attitude of nationalism will still exist (Burhani, 2021). Based on expert opinion regarding the values related to cosmopolitan includes several aspects including; Morals, Politics, and Culture.…”

Ahmadiyya Congregation in the Shadow of Religious Politics: Tensions Between Law and Freedom of Religion

“…This has come in long story. Burhani reveals genealogically that the doctrine of al-wala' wal-bara' (loyalty and disavowal) is the ideology of the Salafists, which continues to be discussed and implemented in the public sphere to indoctrinate a justification that heresy must be resisted and, if necessary, as a holy war that must be done (Burhani 2021). From this, the state has a very important role in giving rise to widespread religious conflicts.…”