2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

It is not all about phase: Amplitude dynamics in corticomuscular interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
5
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings add to an increasing body of literature suggesting that neuronal interactions result in both in phase and amplitude coupling (Bayraktaroglu et al, 2013;Chawla et al, 1999Chawla et al, , 2000Daffertshofer and van Wijk, 2011;Mehrkanoon et al, 2014). On the other hand, amplitude and phase coupling are considered to have different causes and putative functions (Engel et al, 2013), and to operate at different time scales .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…These findings add to an increasing body of literature suggesting that neuronal interactions result in both in phase and amplitude coupling (Bayraktaroglu et al, 2013;Chawla et al, 1999Chawla et al, , 2000Daffertshofer and van Wijk, 2011;Mehrkanoon et al, 2014). On the other hand, amplitude and phase coupling are considered to have different causes and putative functions (Engel et al, 2013), and to operate at different time scales .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The n:m coherence is a generalized coherence measure incorporating both phase and amplitude relationship (Yang et al, 2015, 2016a). A recent study found that EEG oscillations, originating from the primary sensorimotor areas, can transmit not only the phase but also amplitude dynamics through the spinal motoneurons down to the periphery (Bayraktaroglu et al, 2013). Thus, the n:m coherence is more suitable to assess the corticomuscular coupling than other cross-frequency coupling measures purely assessing phase or amplitude relationships (Young and Eggermont, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alpha frequency band is located slightly posterior to the beta (Pfurtscheller and Lopes da Silva, 1999; Ritter et al, 2009) and shows prominent reaction to somatosensory events (Babiloni et al, 2008; van Ede et al, 2014). On the other hand, the amplitude of the beta frequency band EEG is attenuated, but the phase synchronization is maintained between the beta frequency band EEG and the spinal motoneuronal pool activities during tonic motor contraction tasks (Conway et al, 1995; Leocani et al, 1997; Bayraktaroglu et al, 2013). Furthermore, in the post-movement period, the amplitude of the beta-band consistently returns to and exceeds pre-movement levels via synchronization (Pfurtscheller et al, 1996a; Bauer et al, 2006; Jurkiewicz et al, 2006; Parkes et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%