Abstract:Psychological contract (PC) has received great theoretical and research interest in the framework of the employment relationship. Although current research has described its consequences using several different perspectives, less attention has been placed on examining how PC develops. The current time‐lagged study tests a model that incorporates three social exchange indicators: employer contract fulfillment, PC violation, and organizational justice. Using a two‐wave survey data from 203 Spanish workers, we te… Show more
“…Within our sample perception of PCF had positive associations with job satisfaction, affective and normative commitment and bridge employees' plan to continue with their current job. Such findings are not surprising considering unfulfillment of psychological contracts, or a sense of failed reciprocation, may signal a lapse in organizational justice among bridge employees (Estreder et al. , 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Within our sample perception of PCF had positive associations with job satisfaction, affective and normative commitment and bridge employees' plan to continue with their current job. Such findings are not surprising considering unfulfillment of psychological contracts, or a sense of failed reciprocation, may signal a lapse in organizational justice among bridge employees (Estreder et al, 2021). Such a perception of injustice may be especially harmful for bridge employees as they are often aware of and subject to age-related stigma and discrimination at places of work (Finkelstein, 2015).…”
PurposeIn this study the authors examine whether bridge employees tend to hold non-standard jobs, and if so, whether non-standard job choice is deliberate. Moreover, the authors examine whether fulfillment of employment expectations affects the personal and work attitudes of bridge employees.Design/methodology/approachThe authors' research and hypotheses are supported and developed through psychological contract theory. The authors collected data from 195 bridge employees, employed in a variety of jobs, through an online survey. Hypotheses were tested using hierarchical multiple regression.FindingsThis study suggests that some bridge employees may engage in non-standard employment deliberately. Moreover, we show that fulfillment of perceived obligation by employers (psychological contract) is associated with personal and work attitudes (life satisfaction, job satisfaction, affective commitment, normative commitment and intentions to stay) of bridge employees.Research limitations/implicationsWhile this study supports psychological contract theory as an important framework for understanding bridge employment, sample size, cross-sectional data and a lack of diversity in the sample limit causality, generalizability and data robustness. Future research should strive to replicate and extend the current findings.Practical implicationsThe present study underlines the importance of designing jobs to meet the expectations of bridge employees. Also, it highlights the preference of bridge employees to engage in non-standard employment.Originality/valueThe authors extend bridge employment research by empirically examining the relationship between unmet employment expectations and the personal and work attitudes of bridge employees.
“…Within our sample perception of PCF had positive associations with job satisfaction, affective and normative commitment and bridge employees' plan to continue with their current job. Such findings are not surprising considering unfulfillment of psychological contracts, or a sense of failed reciprocation, may signal a lapse in organizational justice among bridge employees (Estreder et al. , 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Within our sample perception of PCF had positive associations with job satisfaction, affective and normative commitment and bridge employees' plan to continue with their current job. Such findings are not surprising considering unfulfillment of psychological contracts, or a sense of failed reciprocation, may signal a lapse in organizational justice among bridge employees (Estreder et al, 2021). Such a perception of injustice may be especially harmful for bridge employees as they are often aware of and subject to age-related stigma and discrimination at places of work (Finkelstein, 2015).…”
PurposeIn this study the authors examine whether bridge employees tend to hold non-standard jobs, and if so, whether non-standard job choice is deliberate. Moreover, the authors examine whether fulfillment of employment expectations affects the personal and work attitudes of bridge employees.Design/methodology/approachThe authors' research and hypotheses are supported and developed through psychological contract theory. The authors collected data from 195 bridge employees, employed in a variety of jobs, through an online survey. Hypotheses were tested using hierarchical multiple regression.FindingsThis study suggests that some bridge employees may engage in non-standard employment deliberately. Moreover, we show that fulfillment of perceived obligation by employers (psychological contract) is associated with personal and work attitudes (life satisfaction, job satisfaction, affective commitment, normative commitment and intentions to stay) of bridge employees.Research limitations/implicationsWhile this study supports psychological contract theory as an important framework for understanding bridge employment, sample size, cross-sectional data and a lack of diversity in the sample limit causality, generalizability and data robustness. Future research should strive to replicate and extend the current findings.Practical implicationsThe present study underlines the importance of designing jobs to meet the expectations of bridge employees. Also, it highlights the preference of bridge employees to engage in non-standard employment.Originality/valueThe authors extend bridge employment research by empirically examining the relationship between unmet employment expectations and the personal and work attitudes of bridge employees.
“…These could include inputs from social networks or positive and negative experiences from previous organizations and employees (Sherman and Morley, 2015). Earlier studies have proposed positive outcomes, such as job satisfaction and employee morale improvements upon fulfillment of the psychological contract (Estreder et al, 2021). Conversely, its violation could result in negative feelings and emotions leading to low morale, negative attitude, poor performance, low job satisfaction and turnover (Morrison and Robinson, 1997;Zhao et al, 2007).…”
Section: Psychological Contractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As they aspire to launch their career, numerous factors play a formative role. A satisfying student experience with enhanced socio-psychological well-being results from their perception of psychological contract fulfillment (Estreder et al, 2021). Any divergence between a student's experience and expectations can indicate students who are at risk (Spies et al, 2010).…”
Section: Psychological Contract Of Students In Hybrid Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These could include inputs from social networks or positive and negative experiences from previous organizations and employees (Sherman and Morley, 2015). Earlier studies have proposed positive outcomes, such as job satisfaction and employee morale improvements upon fulfillment of the psychological contract (Estreder et al. , 2021).…”
PurposeThis paper aims to explore the student psychological contract in the post-pandemic induced hybrid mode of the academic ecosystem in residential business schools of India. The study puts forth three facets of understanding student expectations for contract fulfillment: the business school, academic staff (faculty) and peers.Design/methodology/approachUsing a sequential mixed methodology (qualitative and quantitative), data were gathered and analyzed in two phases. Perceptions of students regarding their expectations were captured through in-depth semi-structured telephonic interviews. The sample comprised 64 students pursuing two years of full-time master's in management courses at four residential business schools in India. Data obtained through interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. The themes extracted were prioritized using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in the second phase.FindingsThe study provides insight into the prioritized expectations of students from their peers, academic staff and the institute. The findings of the study propose that though the expectations may differ across different groups, the mutual interdependence of these groups was mandatory for contract fulfillment.Originality/valueResearch on student psychological contracts in the hybrid mode of business education is scarce. The study provides a holistic perspective on this from the lens of students.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.