“…Eight studies were directed to investigate how participant's characteristics can influence the ownership illusion when using the RHI paradigm such as age, showing a preserved ability to integrate the perceptual illusion of the RH (Riemer et al, 2019;Zeller & Hullin, 2018); laterality, which even though some studies did not found differences in experiencing the RHI between left-handers and righthanders (Smit et al, 2017), others found a more vivid illusion when using the RHI in left-handers compared to right-handers (Ocklenburg et al, 2011) ; psychosis proneness, which foster the sense of ownership toward the rubber hand (Germine et al, 2013); non-clinical autism spectrum that could influence the perception of the rubber arm position (Palmer et al, 2013); or participants presenting some medically unexplained symptom, which presented lower RHI experience compared to a normal participants (Miles et al, 2011). Six studies aimed at investigating how by the manipulation of body sensory or cognitive components is possible to modulate the ownership illusion toward a body part (Dempsey-Jones & Kritikos, 2014;Ferrè et al, 2015;Lopez et al, 2010;Morgan et al, 2011;Ponzo et al, 2018;Schomaker et al, 2011). More specifically, three studies manipulated vestibular information in healthy subjects while performing the RHI paradigm (Ferrè et al, 2015;Lopez et al, 2010;Macauda et al, 2015;Ponzo et al, 2018), and one study during the VHI (Schomaker et al, 2011), and found that through the vestibular stimulation participant increased the sense of proprioceptive drift toward the fake body part enhancing the sense of ownership.…”