Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2005.362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IT Governance Structures, Processes and Relational Mechanisms: Achieving IT/Business Alignment in a Major Belgian Financial Group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
94
0
10

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
94
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…It is difficult to identify all the factors that influence the choice of these elements (De Haes & Van Grembergen 2005). The best possible mix of structures, processes and relational mechanisms will differ for each organization and depend on multiple contingencies including sector and the operating environment of the organization (Ribbers et.al., 2002).…”
Section: Relational Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is difficult to identify all the factors that influence the choice of these elements (De Haes & Van Grembergen 2005). The best possible mix of structures, processes and relational mechanisms will differ for each organization and depend on multiple contingencies including sector and the operating environment of the organization (Ribbers et.al., 2002).…”
Section: Relational Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of IT governance emerged in the late nineties as a subject matter for academic research (see the works of Brown, 1997;Sambamurthy & Zmud, 1999;Peterson, O'Callaghan & Ribbers, 2000;De Haes & Van Grembergen, 2005). Before this body of work the use, monitoring and control of IT was largely encapsulated in IT management theories (see for example Watson, 1989).…”
Section: It Governance Versus It Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are studies on best practices and success factors of IT governance, they target a single organization (Ferguson et al, 2013;Ko & Fink, 2010;Rusu & Nufuka, 2011;Weill & Ross, 2004;Weill & Woodham, 2002). There are also studies that prove the importance of collaborative network IT governance and the business value of IT to the network (CamarinhaMatos et al, 2009;Rabelo & Gusmeroli, 2006;Prasad, Green, & Heales, 2012;Haes & Grembergen, 2005;Melville, Kraemer, & Gurbaxani, 2004), but these do not define CSFs or…”
Section: The Challenges Of It Governance In Cnosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous success factors, which are widely suggested by many researchers (Joshi, Bollen, & Hassinl, 2013;Weill & Woodham, 2002;Grembergen & Haes, 2005;Rusu & Nufuka, 2011), considered to be critical to IT governance effectiveness within organizations. These factors involve transparency and disclosure of IT-related information (Joshi, Bollen & Hassinl, 2013;Weill & Woodham, 2002), risk mitigation, handling and management (Joshi, Bollen, & Hassinl, 2011;Rusu & Nufuka, 2011) and raising governance awareness among employees and managers (Weill & Woodham, 2002;Rusu & Nufuka, 2011;Grembergen & Haes, 2005). Moreover, three key determinants were identified by Ferguson, Green, Vaswani, and Wu (2013) that positively influence the level of effective IT governance within an organization.…”
Section: Effective It Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation